Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop

Messageboards

Don't Reply To This Thread!, by VM mercenario

Combat Manager application, by Kyle Olson

Optimized Drow, by Severed Ronin

Deep 6 FaWtL, by Aberzombie

Pathfinder Player Companion: Pirates of the Inner Sea (PFRPG), by Starglyte

Sneak attack from Stealth RAW, by james maissen

Dispute with DM over a unfair trap, by Stubs McKenzie

A new job opening at Paizo!, by Deiros

Animal Companion for an Urban Ranger?, by OldLace

Please Do Away With 7-Person Tables, by Chot

Why all the Fighter haste?, by Ravingdork

Ganging up on your foes-aren't these guys supposed to be heroes?, by Finn K

New Order of the Stick Strip Up, by Jason Nelson

How powerful do you think this is?, by Sangalor

Ron Paul announces presidential bid., by Kirth Gersen

Online Campaigns

cynarion's Carrion Crown PbP Discussion, by Carrion Crown GM

Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic, by Nyla Soresu

DM Fflash's Shackled City Campaign, by Nowzai al'Nazari

Dain's King Maker Chronicles - Combat Thread, by Dain GM

GM alientude's Shackled City Discussion, by stardust

AZ's HB Nor-Ham, by DM Azure_Zero

Wareagles Legacy of fire, by S. W.

Den of the Slave Takers (4e), by Rev DM

Ayrphish's Dragon Empires - Gameplay, by Chkaia Linthel

Motteditor's Realm of the Fellknight Queen, by Kregimie

Chosen one game play, by Elon Shabin

DM Fflash's Shackled City Campaign OOC, by Nowzai al'Nazari

Tales of Agartha: the Avalon Chronicles, by Lysander Sandwalker

PbP Recruitment - GM / Lictor Lane's Thieves that Go Aaaah! in the Night, by GM/Lictor Lane

Tomb of the Emperor Gods -- PbP, by Tarren the Dungeon Master

   RSS Recent Posts Facebook Twitter Email
Search
Search this Thread:

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

Hey all,

This may have already been posted in the past, but I didn't want to wade through the archives.

I'm currently running TFoE, currently 2/3 of the way in. The PCs have cleared the Hextor (Mockery) and Erythnul (Keeper) sections of the temple. While doing so, they've come upon a couple curious keys... Theldrick has a stone key in his chamber, while there is a silver key found on Grallak's body.

In the text for Theldrick's chamber is the following: "The stone key opens the door that leads to the caves of Erythnul. It is marked with that god’s holy symbol." I totally missed this in the fine print the first time through...

There is no such comment in the grimlock section regarding the silver key. I can only assume the silver key is meant to open the Vecna (Shadow) section of the temple.

In the room details for the central cathedral, and in the opening comments for the three areas, there is no mention that the doors are locked, or that any special keys are required.

I'm guessing that this was an editing oversight or was removed for space. It makes sense, if a bit of railroading, to keep the party going from Hex-Ery-Vec, in order.

Anyway, I only just figured this all out, so now my party has two keys with no locks - they are, of course, mysteriously intrigued. I plan to give TFO a third key, the three of which can be used to open up some kind of special treasure at the end, perhaps...

Again, this may all be common knowledge, but I wanted to pass it along to anyone prepping/running TFoE who are similarly comfused by the forgotten keys.


I noticed this too, as I am currently running this adventure. My PC's went for Hextor (Bane) first cause the keys from the tiefling guards matched that lock anyways. So it was a simple matter to assume the other two doors are locked in area 1.

Thankfully the adventures' editing improves as you progress through the AP and oversights like this are less common.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber)

This was discussed here a long time ago - it's probably still in the archives, but I couldn't find it either. The author basically said what you already guessed: originally there were keys, in order to force the 3 parts to be played in order. Later, this was removed, to make it less linear - but a few things slipped through editing.
The main problem you'll have doing the areas out of order is getting the challenge rating right (3rd level PCs will find the CR 5 area too hard, 5th level PCs will find the CR 3 area too easy - so you'll have to make lots of adjustments, etc.)


The tieflings attempt to retreat to the Hextor area, so this kind of makes it the first area by default as the pcs try to keep an alarm from being raised. In my campaign, I made the door to the vecna area into a secret door. (Vecna being the god of secrets and all). This railroaded my group into doing the areas in order with them being none the wiser that I railroaded them!


Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Older Products / Dungeon Magazine / Age of Worms Adventure Path / All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

Recent threads in Age of Worms Adventure Path

incorporating Loris Raknian into player's backstory



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure PathPathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Society, Pathfinder Battles, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.