Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop

Messageboards

Number given at con used by someone else at another con, by Doug Miles

A compromise for friendly fire that should make EVERYONE happy, by Onishi

Opalescent White Pyramid cracked Ioun Stone and guns., by Shar Tahl

Increasing intelligence retroactively grant bonus languages?, by William Ronald

OMG! I'm actually going to get a chance to play a full campaign!, by lastblacknight

Frog God on vacation and other news, by Dr. Johnny Fever

Pathfinder Society Season Hardcover, by Arazyr

Question about bound blade magus who completes his quest, by FuelDrop

>>Ask *James Jacobs* ALL your Questions Here!<<, by Wildebob

Please Do Away With 7-Person Tables, by Mattastrophic

Should the Synthesist be banned?, by Writer

Spring Attack / Shot on the Run and Acrobatics, by Sindalis

6th Level Barbarian: Furious or Vicious Greataxe?, by Edgar Lamoureux

Paizo Blog: Pathfinder Battles Preview: Familiar Faces, by Mazra

Ryan any thoughts on taming?, by Nihimon

Online Campaigns

Elton's Curse of the Crimson Throne Discussion, by GM Elton

Kyrademon's Transnational PBP -- Discussion, Description, and Preparation, by Kyrademon

DM Carbide's Through a Cracked Mirror: The Dark Road Discussion, by DM Carbide - Dark Road

PF Shackled City SCAP, by Broccan Dunchad

GM Tordek's Souls for a Devil PBP, by GM Tordek

Dream of the Red Chamber: Kyrademon's Jade Regent PBP, Part IV, by Kyrademon

FuriousPhil's We Be Goblins! PbP Recruitment Thread (New players welcome!), by dbeman

DM Barcas - Kingmaker: Rivers Run Red, by Akiros Ismort

DM Carbide's Kingmaker IC, by DM Carbide

The Story of the Stone: Kyrademon's Jade Regent PBP, Part III, by liothonae cromvathar

Navior's Serpent's Skull, by Douena Trestleben

PbP Recruitment - GM / Lictor Lane's Thieves that Go Aaaah! in the Night, by Byron Radanavich

On Stranger Tides: a Goblin Tale, by Our Mysterious Benefactor

The Storm in Isger: Clouds on the Horizon, by Sigil

Sean's Master of the Fallen Fortress, by Noran Kekmore

   RSS Recent Posts Facebook Twitter Email
Search
Search this Thread:


I've got kinda a stupid question about the Single Blade Style feat on page 108. It says in the prerequisites that you need a +10 BAB, but I've been using the feat sense Dragon #301. It seems like it should be a +1 instead of a +10 or is it just me?

(Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber)

It was errataed down to just +1 BAB and Weapon Focus, as I remember. A little digging on the Wizards site will get you the errata file.

Edit: Or I was thinking about Dead-eye. I do agree it may be a little higher than it should be. It really isn't that great of a feat, as nice as the concept is.


Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Older Products / Dragon Magazine / Dragon Compendium / Question about Feat: Single Blade Style All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

Recent threads in Dragon Compendium

Tibbit Questions



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure PathPathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Society, Pathfinder Battles, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.