Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop

Messageboards

Fighter advice needed to all you fighter fans!, by The Sleeping Dragon

Baatorian green steel., by the David

Removing Perception as a Skill, by Mortuum

"Charm Person" and in-Group Fighting, by The Sleeping Dragon

Item Creation Problems, by Inner Heru

Two weapon fighting unarmed, by zagnabbit

Barbarian archtype / Titan Mauler / level 3 / Massive Weapon, by Michael Foster 989

Books you would like to see rewritten by Paizo, by Kthulhu

Uncanny dodge: it help you if you are blinded?, by wraithstrike

Knights of the Black Horse in Kingmaker, by Paul Watson

Ring of Sustanance: Gimmick or Awesome Sauce?, by LoreKeeper

Ways to avoid AoO when within reach of a huge+ creature as a Cleric, by Rasmus Wagner

When I grow up..., by John Spalding

Fear Aura - how does it work?, by wraithstrike

My replacement for Sneak Attack, allowing for ranged rogues to flourish, and eliminating the buddy system., by stuart haffenden

Online Campaigns

DM Zyren's Heart of Journeys, by Attalas

Of Battle, Wolves and Winter. Discussion, by Stavo Warpblood

DM Bloodgargler Kingmaker Gameplay, by Bregor Rowain

Jormungandr's Jade Regent, by Ruhk "The Dandy"

DM Voice's Envoy of Geb - Game Thread, by Gabriel Helminth

DM Zyren's Heart of Light, by DM Zyren/ Heart of Light

DM Maslen Second Darkness pBp Gameplay Thread, by Grumm Gær

Ith's PFS pbp, by Sekhemre of Karnak

DM Voice's Osirion Expedition - Game Thread, by Setesh Bantling

GM Levi's {Advanced} Sands of Osirion Campaign Arc!, by Seif-al-Din ibn-Subhi

Crimson Throne of Lore, by Esmerelda Darkbane

Jade Regent, presented by DM Hamied - Campaign Thread, by Almar Ashfield

Legacy of Fire: Upon Shifting Sand [Chapter 1: Howl of the Carrion King] Recruitment, by Escharid Blackrose

The Story of the Stone: Kyrademon's Jade Regent PBP, Part III, by Melinda Sorn

Seeking 4-6 players for Carrion Crown PbP, by cynarion

   RSS Recent Posts Facebook Twitter Email
Search
Search this Thread:

1 to 50 of 106 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>

Really, it's been long due. I think it will help old threads, like the poodle thread and the frog pond, return to their former glory. People will feel less cowed by all these confusing RPing plots and be able to pick out the 'funny' threads of 'shallow roleplaying'. We also won't feel guilty about burying real Off-topic threads with our own new roleplaying threads, which are becoming increasingly common. More people will be inclined to join us. And we can leave the other threads alone.
Really, there's only so much our poor OTD subforum can handle.

Osirion (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

Wow, for once, I find myself in (partial) agreement with Kobold Cleaver. There have recently been a number of "role playing" threads popping up in the Off-Topic section, and they've disrupted the harmony.

Where we disagree is that I think the funny threads (for example the Poodle Thread, the Jack Thread, and the Untitled thread) should remain in Off Topics.


Aberzombie wrote:

Wow, for once, I find myself in (partial) agreement with Kobold Cleaver. There have recently been a number of "role playing" threads popping up in the Off-Topic section, and they've disrupted the harmony.

Where we disagree is that I think the funny threads (for example the Poodle Thread, the Jack Thread, and the Untitled thread) should remain in Off Topics.

Huh? I thought that KC was proposing moving the RPG threads so that the funny ones would stop being overwhelmed by all of the RPing. He never suggested the funny threads should be moved.

Osirion (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

lynora wrote:
Aberzombie wrote:

Wow, for once, I find myself in (partial) agreement with Kobold Cleaver. There have recently been a number of "role playing" threads popping up in the Off-Topic section, and they've disrupted the harmony.

Where we disagree is that I think the funny threads (for example the Poodle Thread, the Jack Thread, and the Untitled thread) should remain in Off Topics.

Huh? I thought that KC was proposing moving the RPG threads so that the funny ones would stop being overwhelmed by all of the RPing. He never suggested the funny threads should be moved.

I thought that might be the case, but with that deranged lizard you never know....

:)

Paizo Employee (PostMonster General)

There's a difference between the RP threads and the "funny" threads?

Which ones are which?

Qadira (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Battles Case Subscriber)

There are a few threads that started out as jokes and hommages to long-term posters. The Angry Jack Thread started as an hommage to Callous Jack, the Raise of the poodle lords as an hommage to Courtfool, the frog pond to Hugo Solis ...etc. They were just fun. Then a game kind of mutated out of the funny aliases that incorporated free-form roleplaying. A long-term story arc formed with a non-rules emphasis and various threads were created to house aliases for people to play them. What KC is suggesting is a Freeform Roleplaying forum to give these threads a home. They are kinda clogging up the OTD forum at the present.

Qadira (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Battles Case Subscriber)

For the record:

Active Freeform Roleplaying threads currently in the OTD forum:

Eyrie of Celestial Harmony
The Palace of Skulls
The OTD OOC
The Bazaar of the Bizarre
The Oasis of Still Water
The Sanctum of the Sun
The Grove of Ancients
The Roleplaying Game
The Realms of Dream
The Place of the Winds
The Carnival of Shadows

I think that's it at the moment


Add The Great Forest to that list. Since that one was made brand new tonight.


lynora wrote:
Add The Great Forest to that list. Since that one was made brand new tonight.

And the RPG Jack House.

Qadira (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Battles Case Subscriber)

Kobold Cleaver wrote:
lynora wrote:
Add The Great Forest to that list. Since that one was made brand new tonight.
And the RPG Jack House.

Yeah but that one aint all that active, in fact I think it is archived ATM


Patrick Curtin wrote:
Kobold Cleaver wrote:
lynora wrote:
Add The Great Forest to that list. Since that one was made brand new tonight.
And the RPG Jack House.
Yeah but that one aint all that active, in fact I think it is archived ATM

All the more reason. It was buried by real OTD stuff, a new forum might bring it back. It was useful.

Also: The 'Anyone Wanna Join' thread has lately been the setting for RPing. Perhaps a separate thread, with a better title, could be made?


What about the 444th Layer of The Abyss?


Kobold Cleaver wrote:
Patrick Curtin wrote:
Kobold Cleaver wrote:
lynora wrote:
Add The Great Forest to that list. Since that one was made brand new tonight.
And the RPG Jack House.
Yeah but that one aint all that active, in fact I think it is archived ATM
All the more reason. It was buried by real OTD stuff, a new forum might bring it back. It was useful.

Technically, Club Calistria and The Records Room probably also belong in this category.

It will make referencing events which happened there easier if they're in the same forum, even if they never find use again.


Charles Evans 25 wrote:

What about the 444th Layer of The Abyss?

That's more light RPing. It sees use occasionally, but would probably be used rarely.

Perhaps, though. Though we should probably see what its very own resident demon lord thinks.


Hey, who remembers the old 'Crimson Crime' place? That thread was fun. :(

Qadira (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Battles Case Subscriber)

Kobold Cleaver wrote:
Hey, who remembers the old 'Crimson Crime' place? That thread was fun. :(

Yeah I had a couple aliases on that one ..

I suppose we should include the inactive archived threads if the Postmonster does decide to move them ..

Qadira (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Battles Case Subscriber)

Kobold Cleaver wrote:
Charles Evans 25 wrote:

What about the 444th Layer of The Abyss?

That's more light RPing. It sees use occasionally, but would probably be used rarely.

Perhaps, though. Though we should probably see what its very own resident demon lord thinks.

Evil Monkey dwells there, so it could become an active RPG thread.

Well, do we include the Borg thread too? And The Frog Pond was kinda RPG heavy toward the end


Patrick Curtin wrote:
Kobold Cleaver wrote:
Charles Evans 25 wrote:

What about the 444th Layer of The Abyss?

That's more light RPing. It sees use occasionally, but would probably be used rarely.

Perhaps, though. Though we should probably see what its very own resident demon lord thinks.

Evil Monkey dwells there, so it could become an active RPG thread.

Well, do we include the Borg thread too? And The Frog Pond was kinda RPG heavy toward the end

I think that the creators should decide. But the Borg were definetly RP light. The Frog Pond was a bit RP heavy, but I think we should leave it. Make a separate thread if need be.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path, Tales, Battles Case Subscriber)

People really want this?


Mairkurion {tm} wrote:
People really want this?

Why not?

(Pathfinder Adventure Path, Tales, Battles Case Subscriber)

Hey, no fair! I was asking, Why?

Qadira (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Battles Case Subscriber)

Mairkurion {tm} wrote:
Hey, no fair! I was asking, Why?

I think basically it would keep the RP threads segregated and apart from the OTD threads, which some of the older posters liked RP free. And I can respect that..


Mairkurion {tm} wrote:
Hey, no fair! I was asking, Why?

I don't exactly have strong feelings on the subject, but I think we've all been a bit sensitive on the subject of not stepping on people's toes lately. Mostly to keep from becoming an annoyance. In theory, as long as we stick to our own threads it's okay, but there's still some awkwardness floating around.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path, Tales, Battles Case Subscriber)

I guess I've been oblivious...(and with less time on my hands). I kind of liked that there were threads where the planar divisions were weak and they touched one another.

Qadira (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Battles Case Subscriber)

Mairkurion {tm} wrote:
I guess I've been oblivious...(and with less time on my hands). I kind of liked that there were threads where the planar divisions were weak and they touched one another.

Well, they'd still be there, just in a different forum. Not like you couldn't bring Panama Jack over for a special guest star role if you wanted (or Jackin' Ape)

(Pathfinder Adventure Path, Tales, Battles Case Subscriber)

Yeah...but now The Place of the Winds will be stuck in a category..."X not Y."


Wow dudes I think we should totally give those threads a home of their own, but then I might not be able to drop by and visit them anymore....


Peace LVR wrote:

Wow dudes I think we should totally give those threads a home of their own, but then I might not be able to drop by and visit them anymore....

Exactly!


Kobold Cleaver wrote:
Peace LVR wrote:

Wow dudes I think we should totally give those threads a home of their own, but then I might not be able to drop by and visit them anymore....

Exactly!

Oh come on Cleavy! Don't you like my visits?

Andoran (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path Subscriber)

I’m not involved in the free-form roleplay threads in off-topic, but I would also vote to move them to their own forum (although would not be too fussed if they weren’t). There are a lot of them, they clog up the off-topic forum and make the off-topic discussions hard to find amongst the roleplaying threads.

Having said that. I’m more interested in getting something done about the pbp section, so that my game threads don’t keep dropping into archives if they’re not posted on for three days…

Qadira (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Battles Case Subscriber)

Mothman wrote:

...

Having said that. I’m more interested in getting something done about the pbp section, so that my game threads don’t keep dropping into archives if they’re not posted on for three days…

Sign of a healthy community Moth. The amount of PbPs has tripled since I started posting here 18 months ago. Perhaps doubling the amount displayed before archivation (is that even a word?)?


I place my vote in the 'new forum' box.

Qadira (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Battles Case Subscriber)

Still wondering on this one ...

Osirion (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

Patrick Curtin wrote:
Still wondering on this one ...

Me three...


Dragonborn3 wrote:
I place my vote in the 'new forum' box.

I would like to reinstate my earlier post at a +1 bonus.


Dragonborn3 wrote:
Dragonborn3 wrote:
I place my vote in the 'new forum' box.
I would like to reinstate my earlier post at a +1 bonus.

Me too.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Companion Subscriber)

I vote for a move to their own forums as well.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Companion Subscriber)

Patrick Curtin wrote:

For the record:

Active Freeform Roleplaying threads currently in the OTD forum:

Eyrie of Celestial Harmony
The Palace of Skulls
The OTD OOC
The Bazaar of the Bizarre
The Oasis of Still Water
The Sanctum of the Sun
The Grove of Ancients
The Roleplaying Game
The Realms of Dream
The Place of the Winds
The Carnival of Shadows

I think that's it at the moment

Don't forget At the Tavern of the Ranger and the Dryad and "The Tunnels." Those my newest threads.


Aye.

...and add Sandreef and the Pearl of the South.

(Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion Subscriber)

I suppose I need to throw in my humble support for this idea as well...sorry for being a wee late to the show folks :)

Your Friendly Neighborhood Dalesman
"Bringing Big D**n Justice to the Bad Guys Since 1369 DR"

Paizo Employee (PostMonster General)

We've moved the active freeform roleplaying threads into the play-by-post forum. We've also increased the number of threads in the play-by-post forum from 100 to 250, which should keep all currently active play-by-posts out of the archives (including the newly moved threads).

If you have trouble finding your play-by-post thread and don't currently use the "Focus" link, please give it a try.

Osirion (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

Gary Teter wrote:
We've moved the active freeform roleplaying threads into the play-by-post forum.

Huzzah! Thank you Gary. I, for one, think that's where they should have been all along.

Qadira (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Battles Case Subscriber)

Well, not as cool as a sub forum, but at least Aberzombie is happy

Osirion (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

Patrick Curtin wrote:
....but at least Aberzombie is happy

Yes, and a happy Aberzombie is a less hungry Aberzombie.

Qadira (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Battles Case Subscriber)

Aberzombie wrote:
Patrick Curtin wrote:
....but at least Aberzombie is happy
Yes, and a happy Aberzombie is a less hungry Aberzombie.

Yes but what will all your avatars do now that they have no excuse to post in the PbP threads? Perhaps you should start the 'Island of Misfit Avatrs' thread for them to live on ....


I'm gonna miss my checker games with Cranky

Shuffles off to the food court

Osirion (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

Patrick Curtin wrote:
Aberzombie wrote:
Patrick Curtin wrote:
....but at least Aberzombie is happy
Yes, and a happy Aberzombie is a less hungry Aberzombie.

Yes but what will all your avatars do now that they have no excuse to post in the PbP threads? Perhaps you should start the 'Island of Misfit Avatrs' thread for them to live on ....

Meh, there are plenty of other threads to post with those guys on. I'm sure I'll think of something. However, I'll take your advice under consideration with my legal counsel.


Aberzombie wrote:
However, I'll take your advice under consideration with my legal counsel.

I believe this is doable sir, so long as you give Mr. Curtin some credit for the idea.


Harry 'Blacksocks' MacGrognard wrote:

I'm gonna miss my checker games with Cranky

Shuffles off to the food court

It ain't like I died, ya old turd!

Qadira (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Battles Case Subscriber)

Aberzombie wrote:


Meh, there are plenty of other threads to post with those guys on. I'm sure I'll think of something. However, I'll take your advice under consideration with my legal counsel.

Ah but where to put it? Well I guess that's a question for the paladins to settle with a little barratry ....

1 to 50 of 106 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>

Paizo / Messageboards / paizo.com / Website Feedback / All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure PathPathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Society, Pathfinder Battles, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.