Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop

Messageboards

Does a particularly strong were-rat become a particularly strong dire-rat when it changes ?, by richard develyn

[Drop Dead Studios] First Product! "Rogue Glory" Kickstarter!, by KTFish7

Dispute with DM over a unfair trap, by Eridan

Power Attack: Am I Crazy?, by MyTThor

PFS#3-13 Defenders of Nesting Swallow [SPOILERS], by Isaac Duplechain

Evocation optimization?, by Ravingdork

How do you roll stats for new characters?, by Finn K

Real time skill progression, by Valkenr

Black Ray of Fleshparting question, by wraithstrike

Magic- usage, by UltimaGabe

Best Class synergies / team ups?, by Jak the Looney Alchemist

GameMastery Module D0: Hollow's Last Hope (OGL), by Maglok

Three "Impossible" Characters?, by Nitro-13

How does one go about nerfing the Lich template?, by wraithstrike

Required Alignments... why?, by Finn K

Online Campaigns

The Story of the Stone: Kyrademon's Jade Regent PBP, Part III, by Alaric Graff

Tales from the City of Opal, by Dungeon Monkey

DM Zyren's Heart of Darkness, by Salfon Rarith

PFS First Steps by Xzaral, by Jiece Dragonius

The Lost City (4e Paragon), by Rev DM

DM Devon's RotRL aka "The Heroes of Sandpoint", by Vidar Ekstrand

Heathy's Isle of Dread Thread, by Pendobar 'Pip' Bushytoe

DM Zyren's Heart of Journeys, by Attalas

Call of the Wardens Discussion, by Waltz

DM Zyren's Heart of Light, by 'Countess' Victoria

Chronicles of the Silver Rose Company discussion thread, by Patrick Curtin

PFS-Masters of the fallen fortress PBP, by GM_Ravenath

DM CH-P's CoT: The Bastards of Erebus, by Derek Keegan

Iron Carnival (VoA's Merc game), by Pvt.Fury

DM CD's Unrest in Atlus, by DM CD

   RSS Recent Posts Facebook Twitter Email
Search
Search this Thread:

101 to 150 of 211 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>
(Paizo Superscriber)

thenorthman wrote:

Ummmm those teeth look a lot like plant eaters teeth...so that means it well be VERY painful when eaten by it....

I love the cover!

Sean

They look so ... human


Vic Wertz wrote:
Mairkurion {tm} wrote:
I'm hoping they just haven't been assigned yet.

Nope... they're gone. We think we confused people with them.

Now, when modules are designed as part of a series, they'll have some graphical info to tell you that, but it won't be in the title.

Yes, I know the identifer code is missing on the new modules,

but do you think you could post what-would-have-been the code
designation for a particular module on the Message Boards.

It would certainly help those of us with 6th grade educations
who are not confused by a letter followed by a number to inventory
your wonderful product offerings in a orderly manner.

Thanks !

Paizo Employee (Creative Director)

Bollo wrote:

Yes, I know the identifer code is missing on the new modules,

but do you think you could post what-would-have-been the code
designation for a particular module on the Message Boards.

It would certainly help those of us with 6th grade educations
who are not confused by a letter followed by a number to inventory
your wonderful product offerings in a orderly manner.

Carrion Hill would have probably gotten a "U" code for Urban. Before we tossed out those codes, we also considered giving it a "H" code for a new series of "Horror" adventures, or an "L" code for (what I hope will be) a series of Lovecraftian themed adventures.


James Jacobs wrote:
Bollo wrote:

Yes, I know the identifer code is missing on the new modules,

but do you think you could post what-would-have-been the code
designation for a particular module on the Message Boards.

It would certainly help those of us with 6th grade educations
who are not confused by a letter followed by a number to inventory
your wonderful product offerings in a orderly manner.

Carrion Hill would have probably gotten a "U" code for Urban. Before we tossed out those codes, we also considered giving it a "H" code for a new series of "Horror" adventures, or an "L" code for (what I hope will be) a series of Lovecraftian themed adventures.

Cool.

Just in time for Halloween :-)

More L's please !

B.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Modules Subscriber)

James Jacobs wrote:
Carrion Hill would have probably gotten a "U" code for Urban. Before we tossed out those codes, we also considered giving it a "H" code for a new series of "Horror" adventures, or an "L" code for (what I hope will be) a series of Lovecraftian themed adventures.

I sure do miss the codes. They made it infinitely easier to sort the modules on the shelf and access them in a database. Because -- let's face it -- most of the titles are interchangeable after a while. If I'm looking for "that adventure where they go and fight the wererat crime lord" or something, it's easier to scan through the U's than it is to say, "Okay, was that 'Villains of Vonzibar?' Or maybe 'Secret of Sikkadim?' Or 'The Evil Secret?' Or maybe 'The Lord's Mask?'" And then have to pull ALL those off the shelf and flip through them all.


Not only is the cover itself truly gorgeous... I just noticed that the font used for the title is appropriately "pulp-y", too! :)


I would have given it the following codes:

L for Lovecraft
Y for Yog-Sothoth
U for Ustalav and Urban
F for level Five PCs


How about T for tentacles?

-The Gneech ("gibber")


Sean K Reynolds wrote:

I would have given it the following codes:

L for Lovecraft
Y for Yog-Sothoth
U for Ustalav and Urban
F for level Five PCs

THIS is the answer! Not taking away the code, but making it more complicated!

So, this would be LYUFT-1, correct?


Mouthy Upstart wrote:
Sean K Reynolds wrote:

I would have given it the following codes:

L for Lovecraft
Y for Yog-Sothoth
U for Ustalav and Urban
F for level Five PCs

THIS is the answer! Not taking away the code, but making it more complicated!

So, this would be LYUFT-1, correct?

we approve of such notions... they make a quick intake of what os this about a lot easier!


John Robey wrote:

How about T for tentacles?

-The Gneech ("gibber")

T could also for for Tekeli-li John my dear fellow:)

Rich


Pulptastic cover, by the way:)

Love it.

Mnarr


Mouthy Upstart wrote:
Sean K Reynolds wrote:

I would have given it the following codes:

L for Lovecraft
Y for Yog-Sothoth
U for Ustalav and Urban
F for level Five PCs

THIS is the answer! Not taking away the code, but making it more complicated!

So, this would be LYUFT-1, correct?

Don't forget H for Horror (BTW, what does 'T' stand for?); I'd personally classify it according to the following formula:

[Genre][Subgenre(s)][Location][Other Keywords/Subjects][Level]-[Module Number]

Which would be: HULUY5-1 (Horror, Urban, Lovecraftian, Ustalav, Yog-Sothoth, 5th level characters - Module #1). :)

Osirion (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Companion Subscriber)

So, Dunwich Horror done fantasy style?

are we going to see others too, like Shadows over Insmouth? The Kingsport one?


Mactaka wrote:

So, Dunwich Horror done fantasy style?

are we going to see others too, like Shadows over Insmouth? The Kingsport one?

Tentacle held up high for Shadow!

I'm presuming if it sells well and is popular, they may return, rather like (ahem) the Styes - I'd certainly be game for a revisit, although it would also be interesting to see what others would make of the Hill.


James Jacobs wrote:
Bollo wrote:

Yes, I know the identifer code is missing on the new modules,

but do you think you could post what-would-have-been the code
designation for a particular module on the Message Boards.

It would certainly help those of us with 6th grade educations
who are not confused by a letter followed by a number to inventory
your wonderful product offerings in a orderly manner.

Carrion Hill would have probably gotten a "U" code for Urban. Before we tossed out those codes, we also considered giving it a "H" code for a new series of "Horror" adventures, or an "L" code for (what I hope will be) a series of Lovecraftian themed adventures.

A series of Lovecraftian themed adventures...

The stars must be right!


Richard Pett wrote:
Mactaka wrote:

So, Dunwich Horror done fantasy style?

are we going to see others too, like Shadows over Insmouth? The Kingsport one?

Tentacle held up high for Shadow!

I'm presuming if it sells well and is popular, they may return, rather like (ahem) the Styes - I'd certainly be game for a revisit, although it would also be interesting to see what others would make of the Hill.

I have already incorpulated, I mean incorporated Mi-Go and a whole bunch of other HPL inspired stuff in my AoW campaign. It was screaming out for it.

Paizo Employee (Technical Director)

I've updated the description to match the finished product. (That's right, we used the word "recrudescence.")

I also updated the cover image, but nothing really changed—the new image has maybe a little teeny bit more contrast.

Qadira (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Modules, Tales Subscriber)

That critter on the cover has really nice grill work....I wonder who it's dentist is?

Cheliax (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules Subscriber)

Odd question but who are the iconic's for this one?

Paizo Employee (Creative Director)

Kevin Mack wrote:

Odd question but who are the iconic's for this one?

I can't be sure, but I think it's Merisiel, Harsk, Kyra, and Seltyiel.

Cheliax (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules Subscriber)

*Sigh* Still no Lini then. Goes off to sulk.

Paizo Employee (Creative Director)

Kevin Mack wrote:
*Sigh* Still no Lini then. Goes off to sulk.

Lini will be one of the iconics in Kingmaker, and she'll also probably be in "Realm of the Fellnight Queen."

(RPG Superstar 2009, Contributor)

James Jacobs wrote:
Lini will...also probably be in "Realm of the Fellnight Queen."

My developer told me, "It Is Decidedly So." But he could have been consulting a Magic 8-Ball. ;-)

--Neil


Never trust an elf! I mean, a developer.

(RPG Superstar 2009, Contributor)

Especially so for one with the initials S...K...R... ;-P


NSpicer wrote:
Especially so for one with the initials S...K...R... ;-P

Come to think of it, that sounds suspiciously like a wrestling "gimmick"... just compare SKR to HHH and HBK! ;P

(and Sean wears those ultra-cool glasses, too, which reminds me a bit of The Rock...)

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber)

Awww.. This would have been a great one for Halloween.. To bad its a November release..

~Nitehood

Paizo Employee (Creative Director)

Nitehood wrote:

Awww.. This would have been a great one for Halloween.. To bad its a November release..

~Nitehood

The funny part is, of course, that Carrion Hill was original scheduled as a September release but it slipped due to interference from RPG creation factors.

(Pathfinder Campaign Setting Charter Superscriber)

That cover is freakin' awesome. Love the pulp look! I also appreciate Paizo setting modules & PFS scenarios in areas/countries where there have been no adventure paths to date. Every little bit helps flesh out the world. Awesome.

And as a huge fan of both "The Styes" and its sequel, "The Weavers", I do hope you let Richard Pett come back for more.

Andoran (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path Subscriber)

Andrew Turner wrote:
Big Tex wrote:
Alaska's a state?!...

I heard that! In fact, Alaska is twice the size of measly Texas, and equivalent in land mass to the entire Eastern Seaboard, from Maine to Florida and west of Tennessee. Yes, I am proud of my big honkin' country, er, state, I mean...

Alaska is sooo big, that when I drive from Fairbanks (my home) to the next biggest city, Anchorage, it's like a Seattelite driving to Eureka, CA, or a New Yorker driving to Raleigh, NC. That's right, think BIG.

However, if you cut Alaska in half then Texas would be....the THIRD largest state in the Union!

Paizo Employee (Technical Director)

BenS wrote:
And as a huge fan of both "The Styes" and its sequel, "The Weavers", I do hope you let Richard Pett come back for more.

I'm not sure we can stop him!

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber)

Heathansson wrote:
They're too high level for it. I'll just get new ones.

There is no such thing as "too high level" my friend. <eg>


Another temptation, I will have to see what's in the budget next paycheck but anything inspired by Lovecraft gets my immediate attention.

(Paizo Superscriber)

The main game I'm running right now is 3.5e FR but frequently a number of my five players don't show up. This past session I only got the two most guaranteed players so we rolled up level 6 Pathfinder characters, a cleric of Sarenrae and a paladin of ... well, the player is indecisive but probably Abadar.

I told them they were in Ustalav and I planned to put them in Expedition to Castle Ravenloft (in Ustalav in Golarion but EtCR is pretty setting neutral anyway and Ustalav seemed an ideal choice). I'd prefer to run Carrion Hill as my fall-back module though, for a number of reasons.

My question is this: I see Carrion Hill is for a party of level 5 characters. How do you think it would run for a level 6 cleric and a level 6 paladin by themselves? The cleric is Channel-focused.

I've got Carrion Hill coming in the mail right now but even once I get it, I'm not a very good judge of how much is too much.


David Wickham wrote:
Yeah, Texas is a big state right? :)

Yes, but the population's not large in the way you'd expect. Instead of there being more people, it's just that everyone there is around ten feet tall. On the positive side, a tourist can feed his entire family for three days off of just a single appetizer at most Texan burger joints.


Texas: It's like a whole other country.®


Awwwww yeah! Giving the HPL some love! I'm feelin' it! You can bet this is showing up in my campaign.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber)

An excellent module Sir Pett.

^_^ As usual, I intend at some point to sicc this on a group of players.

Preferably at higher levels to take advantage of the fun stuff!

grins evilly


Turin the Mad wrote:

An excellent module Sir Pett.

^_^ As usual, I intend at some point to sicc this on a group of players.

Preferably at higher levels to take advantage of the fun stuff!

grins evilly

Oh, you just made me envious (never a good thing with a Chelaxian dwarf) because my copy hasn't arrived yet...

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber)

Asgetrion wrote:
Turin the Mad wrote:

An excellent module Sir Pett.

^_^ As usual, I intend at some point to sicc this on a group of players.

Preferably at higher levels to take advantage of the fun stuff!

grins evilly

Oh, you just made me envious (never a good thing with a Chelaxian dwarf) because my copy hasn't arrived yet...

Are you in service to the Runelord of Envy by any chance? If not, now's a good time to start racking up those Sin points. :P


Turin the Mad wrote:
Asgetrion wrote:
Turin the Mad wrote:

An excellent module Sir Pett.

^_^ As usual, I intend at some point to sicc this on a group of players.

Preferably at higher levels to take advantage of the fun stuff!

grins evilly

Oh, you just made me envious (never a good thing with a Chelaxian dwarf) because my copy hasn't arrived yet...
Are you in service to the Runelord of Envy by any chance? If not, now's a good time to start racking up those Sin points. :P

Who? Oh, you mean that Thassilonian upstart... which makes your question utterly ridiculous! Why would a true inheritor to the glory of Azlant stoop so low?!? I'm *CHELAXIAN*, man! I serve the Divine Asmodeus and the Blessed Majestrix, and through them our Glorious Empire! Why would I even *spit* in the direction of these so-called 'Rude Lords' or whatever? ;)

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber)

Asgetrion wrote:
Turin the Mad wrote:
Asgetrion wrote:
Turin the Mad wrote:

An excellent module Sir Pett.

^_^ As usual, I intend at some point to sicc this on a group of players.

Preferably at higher levels to take advantage of the fun stuff!

grins evilly

Oh, you just made me envious (never a good thing with a Chelaxian dwarf) because my copy hasn't arrived yet...
Are you in service to the Runelord of Envy by any chance? If not, now's a good time to start racking up those Sin points. :P

Who? Oh, you mean that Thassilonian upstart... which makes your question utterly ridiculous! Why would a true inheritor to the glory of Azlant stoop so low?!? I'm *CHELAXIAN*, man! I serve the Divine Asmodeus and the Blessed Majestrix, and through them our Glorious Empire! Why would I even *spit* in the direction of these so-called 'Rude Lords' or whatever? ;)

Upstarts eh, oh descendant of colonists/refugees? ;)

(Paizo Superscriber)

Wolf Munroe wrote:

The main game I'm running right now is 3.5e FR but frequently a number of my five players don't show up. This past session I only got the two most guaranteed players so we rolled up level 6 Pathfinder characters, a cleric of Sarenrae and a paladin of ... well, the player is indecisive but probably Abadar.

I told them they were in Ustalav and I planned to put them in Expedition to Castle Ravenloft (in Ustalav in Golarion but EtCR is pretty setting neutral anyway and Ustalav seemed an ideal choice). I'd prefer to run Carrion Hill as my fall-back module though, for a number of reasons.

My question is this: I see Carrion Hill is for a party of level 5 characters. How do you think it would run for a level 6 cleric and a level 6 paladin by themselves? The cleric is Channel-focused.

I've got Carrion Hill coming in the mail right now but even once I get it, I'm not a very good judge of how much is too much.

It looks pretty good for 6th level characters (my players will probably be that level when they hit it.) I think that most of the encounters are less challenges and more of a role playing opportunity.

That being said, adding a level to each of the Named NPCs and including a few more flunkies to each group and maybe letting the Carrion Hill Monster gain another HD or so would easily make it playable. Nothing you could't adapt on the fly or in 5 or so minutes.

(Before each module, I make 3x5 cards for all of the combat enemies in an adventure. That way, I can make quick changes if one of the players doesn;t show up or if they add an NPC on the fly.)


Turin the Mad wrote:

Upstarts eh, oh descendant of colonists/refugees? ;)

Oh, but haven't we embraced our True Destiny since our humble beginning? Are we not THE most glorious, powerful empire that has *EVER* existed on Golarion? Are we not the rightful inheritors of Azlanti greatness? Why, I even have irrefutable proof of my own clan's roots in that fabled realm -- I just choose not to show it to you (I *could* show you some paintings my imp servants did on my naked dwarven dance, if you want to see them?). ;)

So, don't talk about 'upstarts' or 'refugees' to me, for have we not achieved what no other nation ever has?

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber)

Asgetrion wrote:
Turin the Mad wrote:

Upstarts eh, oh descendant of colonists/refugees? ;)

Oh, but haven't we embraced our True Destiny since our humble beginning? Are we not THE most glorious, powerful empire that has *EVER* existed on Golarion? Are we not the rightful inheritors of Azlanti greatness? Why, I even have irrefutable proof of my own clan's roots in that fabled realm -- I just choose not to show it to you (I *could* show you some paintings my imp servants did on my naked dwarven dance, if you want to see them?). ;)

So, don't talk about 'upstarts' or 'refugees' to me, for have we not achieved what no other nation ever has?

;)

Reclaim the ancient realm of Taldor at its height, then we can compare with older realms. ^_^

Of course, about then the infernal contracts will come due ...


Turin the Mad wrote:
Of course, about then the infernal contracts will come due ...

And I'm still looking for a 500 lb. non-magically enhanced chicken to satisfy that portion of the contract.


It's mine! Hahahahahahahahaaa! Mine all mine!!!!!
Mwahahahahahaaaa......


I love you heathy, have a horrible mad xmas.

Tekeli-li


Justa hanging some ornaments

Spoiler:
on the trees in the sunless grove.

101 to 150 of 211 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>

Paizo / Messageboards / paizo.com / All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure PathPathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Society, Pathfinder Battles, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.