Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop

Messageboards

Dispute with DM over a unfair trap, by Robb Smith

Unclaimed Territory, by Mike Silva

Rogue Eidolon's Guide to Fighters (Optimisation), by Xallin

Who is playing in the Dragon Empires?, by Mike Silva

Lootable Items: Boars carrying +5 Vorpal Chain-Swords or something more realistic?, by Shadoww1243

Required Alignments... why?, by TriOmegaZero

GM Advice: How do I make traps more interesting?, by hogarth

Pearl of Power and Extracts. Do they restore lost extracts?, by BigNorseWolf

Multiclassing with Archetypes, by Ash_Gazn

Good source of puzzles and traps for high level, by DM Azure_Zero

Paizo Blog: Pathfinder Battles Preview: Familiar Faces, by Ryan. Costello

House Ruling Reincarnate, by Thomas LeBlanc

Couple of quirks I noticed, by Interzone

To Be or Not To Be, by Chris Lambertz

I'm bored: give me ideas for a new base class I can design!, by Deiros

Online Campaigns

In Darkest Times Recruitment: Ongoing, by GM Kyle

Of Battle, Wolves and Winter. Discussion, by pinvendor

The Story of the Stone: Kyrademon's Jade Regent PBP, Part III, by Alaric Graff

DM AK's Sargavan Saga, by DM Alexander Kilcoyne

GM Sgmendez's SteamFu Adventures Discussion, by Cassian Vespertine

DM Corvus' Carrion Crown PBP, by Iesha Shadowstar-Petrosca

Adventures to the Jade Regent, by Tanimoto

DM - Tareth's Modified Kingmaker Campaign Gameplay, by Thad Tanner

Ashardaldon Series OOC, by Sir Respen Bayleef

Chapter 1: An Unexpected Delivery, by Cassian Vespertine

The Temple of Elemental Evil, by Pettry Velten

DM Bloodgargler Serpent's Skull OOC, by Merck

DM Harpwizard’s Heroes of Elsir Vale OOC Discussion, by Thordak son of Throtgar

The_Ninja_DM's Carrion Crown, by Evangline Valeria Aurora

Shackled City (Pathfinder) - GM_Chris - OOC, by Atol Lem

   RSS Recent Posts Facebook Twitter Email
Search
Search this Thread:


Hey, is the large green dragon actually large (2x2 squares)?

Andoran (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber)

Arromir wrote:
Hey, is the large green dragon actually large (2x2 squares)?

No. Yes, technically, but it's not as big as you're probably hoping. It's the same size as the Fang Dragon. It's head is a little funky, but overall, these are some good-quality minis (for plastic, pre-painted). Worth the cost.


I picked mine up the other day at FLGS and was a bit disappointed. The quality and detail of the minis themselves is less than previous editions and the new rules are, well, too 4e for my taste. I want my old alignments back!!


Andrew Turner wrote:
Arromir wrote:
Hey, is the large green dragon actually large (2x2 squares)?
No. Yes, technically, but it's not as big as you're probably hoping. It's the same size as the Fang Dragon. It's head is a little funky, but overall, these are some good-quality minis (for plastic, pre-painted). Worth the cost.

So it's definitely bigger than my Young Black Dragon?

(Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber)

Yes the Green Dragon takes up 4 squares (2x2).

However...The starter doesnt come with an Exiled Drow Fighter.
The 5th mini is a Yaun-ti Swiftscale.

You might want to fix that before you get some angry Drow fans who order. :)


I may have over looked it but was there any reason given for the cut down in number of miniatures given for the new starter? Or is this more or less just a rules update?


Because this starter set is designed to hang on a peg in Wal Mart? It looks like more "mass market friendly" packaging.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Tales Subscriber)

Agreed. I don't mind the non-random figures though. That way I can decide if I want the pack or not based on what's in there.


yoda8myhead wrote:
I picked mine up the other day at FLGS and was a bit disappointed. The quality and detail of the minis themselves is less than previous editions

How were the double-sided battlemaps? What do they look like?

Andoran (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

Boy, if these are anything like the new random minis - ick. The quality of those minis is sorely lacking.

That said, I was at my FLGS the other day and saw some non-random Rackham minis. Awesome. But $40? Ick. Any hope that the price will drop for those?

Qadira (RPG Superstar 2008 Top 6, Contributor)

James Leslie wrote:
I may have over looked it but was there any reason given for the cut down in number of miniatures given for the new starter? Or is this more or less just a rules update?

The price point dropped by 5 bucks, so I think that's part of the reason for fewer figures. Also, always including a dragon is a fairly good deal by D&D Mini standards, dragons are normally hard to get.


Saurstalk wrote:
Boy, if these are anything like the new random minis - ick. The quality of those minis is sorely lacking.

Judge the quality (or rather, the lack of it) for yourself:

Large Pics of Starter Minis.

Andoran (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Battles Case Subscriber)

Maps: very nice, I like the double sided format, and the maps are very pretty.

Die: Seems weirdly lightweight, like it were hollow. Just feels strange.

Stat Cards: I don't like that the starter set cards do not come with a D&D 4.0 stat side, rather with tactical advice. It may be useful for a first time player, so I can understand it, but it will quickly become a useless side of the card. Other than that, I don't much care for the new color scheme either, but the cards are formatted nicely to let you know everything you need to know about the skirmish figure pretty quickly and easily.

Rulebook: Line of sight (page 25) just has a picture and no text to tell you how it was determined. Other than that, the rules are concise and clear.

Minis: Pretty typical/average for D&D minis. Decent sculpts, ok paint jobs; could use some touch ups if you want them to really stand out. Except: I hate the Green Dragon. Chop off its lousy deal-breaking head and I might be able to deal with it, but even so, it's no Dragon by my daughter's dragonomicon description, and that's all that matters to me :P


Hi all -

WotC is planning on re-producing some of the "best of..." DDM1/3e mini's for a DDM2/4e fit, but since I'm not going that way, and I like buying new mini's for my game I'm wondering if anybody is considering converting these DDM2/4e mini's to a 3/5/OGL RPG standard and a DDM1. I'm not even sure that it's possible to convert the DDM2 to DDM1, but I'm wondering if someone is thinking about doing it. I'd like to but I don't know the mechanics of DDM1 well enough to be able to do so.
I'd like to help however.
Be Well,
Theocrat Issak


yoda8myhead wrote:
I picked mine up the other day at FLGS and was a bit disappointed. The quality and detail of the minis themselves is less than previous editions and the new rules are, well, too 4e for my taste. I want my old alignments back!!

I wonder what you expected? these combat rules are almost exactly how 4e combat will work...


I think the paint and body job are good; the nose looks really dumb though. I plan on clipping the horn on the nose off and doing a touch up paint job on him. XP


I gave the green dragon a nose job. I used the horns from his nose and cheeks to add two spines to the crest. It looks great.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

i picked this up at my local gaming store this past weekend. while i personally could care less about the 4e-lite rules booklet, 5 painted minis (including a large-size dragon) + 5 battle maps (one of the sheet is actually two smaller locations) that cover a wide variety of locations = great deal for the money.

heartily recommended.


Paizo / Messageboards / paizo.com / All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

Recent threads in Product Discussion

[Cubicle 7 Entertainment] 1001 Spells (PFRPG)
Pathfinder Tales: City of the Fallen Sky
[Jon Brazer Enterprises] Book of Beasts: Monsters of the Shadow Plane (PFRPG)
[Super Genius Games] Bullet Points: 6 Godling Feats (PFRPG) PDF
Pathfinder Campaign Setting: Dragon Empires Gazetteer (PFRPG)
[Misfit Studios] The Spellweaver (PFRPG) PDF
Pathfinder Campaign Setting: Distant Worlds (PFRPG)
[Super Genius Games] The Genius Guide to the Shadow Assassin (PFRPG) PDF
[Frog God Games] Northlands Saga 1: Vengeance of the Long Serpent (PFRPG)
[Super Genius Games] The Genius Guide to What's in My Pocket? (PFRPG) PDF
[Louis Porter Jr. Design] NeoExodus: A House Divided Campaign Setting (PFRPG)
[WizKids / NECA] Pathfinder Battles: Heroes & Monsters
[Super Genius Games] Ultimate Options: Grit and Gunslingers (PFRPG) PDF
[Open Design] Kobold Quarterly 20
[Fire Mountain Games] Way of the Wicked—Book One: Knot of Thorns (PFRPG) PDF
[Frog God Games] Splinters of Faith 3: Culvert Operations (PFRPG)
Pathfinder Adventure Path #43: The Haunting of Harrowstone (Carrion Crown 1 of 6) (PFRPG)
GameMastery Module D0: Hollow's Last Hope (OGL)
Pathfinder Player Companion: Pirates of the Inner Sea (PFRPG)
Pathfinder Society Scenario #4–03: The Golemworks Incident (PFRPG) PDF



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure PathPathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Society, Pathfinder Battles, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.