'Response' asserting it is not ignoring the quoted post when, to all intents and purposes, as far as content goes it practically ignores the previous post.
Firing of the first barrage of a long and drawn out flamewar about copyright infringement which WILL be responded to by the defensive poster of the pdf.
Firing of the first barrage of a long and drawn out flamewar about copyright infringement which WILL be responded to by the defensive poster of the pdf.
Obnoxious post jumping on minor error in description of copyright law in an attempt to remind everyone that poster is actually a Very Important Lawyer and that those who are not Very Important Lawyers should quit discussing any legal related topic without such Very Important Lawyer's Very Important input with regards to such matters.
Witty, sarcastic remark to endear the reader to the author.
Statement of opinion.
Anecdotal evidence to reinforce opinion.
Allusion to opinion as fact.
Inflammatory remark to engender hostility with other posters and prompt response.
I wonder if this might belong in the Word Games section?
Post that answers the OP, ignoring all prior posts regarding the topic and re-igniting forgotten flame wars, drenched in arrogance and passive-aggressive jabs.
Test which exists purely for the enjoyment of the cruel, cruel teacher.
Post indicating that poster took a few college courses nearly ten years ago form a College of Education. And despite never have graduated (or even continued), he believes he is qualified to tell previous poster that he knows NOTHING about "how it really is" for teachers today and that he should avoid making such remarks in the future.
This post makes no logical sense.
Also... the fourteenth word is misspelled. And the verb in the second sentence is improperly conjugated.