Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop

Messageboards

Two weapon fighting unarmed, by blackbloodtroll

Optimized Drow, by Edgar Lamoureux

Paizo Kickstarter?, by thenorthman

The year of the adventure? (Extremely confused), by GeraintElberion

skill points question, by The Sleeping Dragon

Questions from a Society Magus, by Raymond Lambert

Bestiary 4 Wish List, by Zaister

"Charm Person" and in-Group Fighting, by The Sleeping Dragon

Ring of Sustanance: Gimmick or Awesome Sauce?, by LoreKeeper

How powerful do you think this is?, by Sangalor

Combat Manager application, by eXaminator

Question about bound blade magus who completes his quest, by Liam Warner

Ninja Two-Weapon Fighting Str build with katana, by blackbloodtroll

Broken Moon (GM Reference), by Drakli

Seeking feedback on variant shapechange mechanic, by Liam Warner

Online Campaigns

Wellards RotRL OOC thread, by Dabbler

Aubrey's Rise of the Runelords campaign, by Illes Elandru

DM Wellards RotRL chapter two... The Skinsaw Murders, by Esteriande d'Litran

New Beginnings!, by Verisim

Academy of Secrets, by Jorge Hashten

DM Bloodgargler Serpent's Skull Gameplay, by Gatherine 'Taboofox' Deepheavy

Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic, by Helaman

Left in Sandpoint, by Voronwe Andosana

The Story of the Stone: Kyrademon's Jade Regent PBP, Part III, by Melinda Sorn

DM Barcas - First Steps (PFS), by Dasiji Lekaya

Blood of Dragonscar-Level 15, by Watcher Uatu

The Screaming Sky - DM Downrightamazed, by Alastair Cadwallader

Shackled City (Pathfinder) - GM_Chris, by Doctor Abner Svengalu Toffitt

Chapter 1: A Journey to Start a Story, by Xao Pa-Wu

Legacy of Fire: Upon Shifting Sand [Chapter 1: Howl of the Carrion King] Recruitment, by Aruetii

   RSS Recent Posts Facebook Twitter Email
Search
Search this Thread:


Though fans of Dungeons & Dragons have led the Old School Revival, many other tabletop roleplaying games from the 1970s and early '80s still have fans. One of the oldest, strongest and best loved is the Hero System - the all-encompassing Hero Games rules system founded on the landmark 1981 superhero RPG Champions.

Full article found here.

My opinion? Wow. Talk about a long, arduous road. Shows how even good customer service and product is not enough: you've got to evolve with the times. Wishing the best to Hero and the MMO!


Curse my work's firewall.

Hero does seem to be evolving. I am surprised to see 6th edition not make more drastic changes. This seems a risky move to me as I still remember the 3.0 -> 3.5 hate. Then again, they are giving it a glossy new look. Something people have been asking for. I always thought content was more important than a slick presentation, but it appears I am in the minority. That is not to say I am questioning the content of 6th edition.

What bugs me, and no where near the amount of angst certain other systems have incurred, is the decision to 'save' some rules and release them in later supplements. I am looking at you Advanced Player's Guide. I understand why they are doing it. The market has proven this a profitable strategy. I am leaning towards demonstrating my disfavor by not following Hero into 6th. It is a tough decision though, because it looks like they have really tightened the system up.

(Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber)

CourtFool wrote:

Curse my work's firewall.

Hero does seem to be evolving. I am surprised to see 6th edition not make more drastic changes. This seems a risky move to me as I still remember the 3.0 -> 3.5 hate. Then again, they are giving it a glossy new look. Something people have been asking for. I always thought content was more important than a slick presentation, but it appears I am in the minority. That is not to say I am questioning the content of 6th edition.

What bugs me, and no where near the amount of angst certain other systems have incurred, is the decision to 'save' some rules and release them in later supplements. I am looking at you Advanced Player's Guide. I understand why they are doing it. The market has proven this a profitable strategy. I am leaning towards demonstrating my disfavor by not following Hero into 6th. It is a tough decision though, because it looks like they have really tightened the system up.

The big problem with 5th revised was, to me, it was thicker than Pathfinder's book, but made of newsprint inside. Or just about that cheaply. The FLGS kept trying to sell me one and telling me 'Dude, it's 700 pages, you can't do 700 pages for $50 on decent paper'.

I never bought the revised version, I do have the original 5th version (which had slightly better paper).

It's not the 'slickness' or 'wow cool art'. It's the 'Oh damn, I ripped another page in this stupid cheap book'. I know people who bought it and the spine ripped apart and pages tore, because it was cheaply made. Someone in accounting made that decision.


(Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber)

CourtFool wrote:
mdt wrote:
I know people who bought it and the spine ripped apart and pages tore, because it was cheaply made. Someone in accounting made that decision.

From Steve Long himself: The paper question's been discussed extensively on a couple other threads in this forum, if you want to look them up. The basic gist is: this is actually better paper than 5E's paper, with a higher rag content for increased strength (which we felt was necessary, given the size of the book). If we bleached it out to make it whiter, it would weaken the paper, defeating the point of selecting it in the first place. ;)

Some further discussion

I was looking at a copy in the gaming store and a page tore while I was flipping through it. Maybe the local area just got a bad batch, but, when you've got people you know complaining about the spine falling apart and the pages tearing during normal game use...


Mine has held up just fine. I do not think you could accidentally tear it.

(Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber)

CourtFool wrote:
Mine has held up just fine. I do not think you could accidentally tear it.

LOL,

There hasn't been a sheet of paper made that goes in a book that can't be accidentally torn.

I am glad yours held up though.


mdt wrote:
CourtFool wrote:
Mine has held up just fine. I do not think you could accidentally tear it.

LOL,

There hasn't been a sheet of paper made that goes in a book that can't be accidentally torn.

I am glad yours held up though.

Yeah, maybe I'm secretly Grond, but I've torn my fair share of book pages by accident.

Maybe your copy is written on the Disks of Mishakal or the golden plates of Joseph Smith, though.


mdt wrote:
There hasn't been a sheet of paper made that goes in a book that can't be accidentally torn.

Do tell.


Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Community / Gaming / Other RPGs / All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

Recent threads in Other RPGs

[Misfit Studios] Rogue Mage Kickstarter Underway



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure PathPathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Society, Pathfinder Battles, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.