Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop

Messageboards

Auction Houses, by Forlarren

Can you keep your class a secret?, by Blaeringr

Sin Magic: How does it work?, by Mergy

10 things you love and hate about PF, by Norren

KILLER GM's 2011 Return to the Tomb of Horrors Pathfinder Campaign!, by carborundum

OMG! I'm actually going to get a chance to play a full campaign!, by Sangalor

Arcticon Valparaiso IN Saturday, February 18th, by VanceMadrox

Please Do Away With 7-Person Tables, by Mad Alchemist

Sell me on Barbarian Rage?, by Wiggz

{Fat Goblin Games} SHADOWS over VATHAK- $1 for the next 24 hours!, by John Benbo

This is sure to start a fight,...lol, by Shadowborn

Price check: Elemental body item with only one form., by Joyd

How do you handle standard supplies and whatnot?, by Axebeard

Ghostrider 2, by pres man

Some home brew minis, by Sean K Reynolds

Online Campaigns

DM Wellards Jade Regent, by Úlfheðinn Sigmundarson

The Screaming Sky - DM Downrightamazed, by Alastair Cadwallader

Megan's Kingmaker PbP, by Lothar Narda

The Story of the Stone: Kyrademon's Jade Regent PBP, Part III, by Alaric Graff

DM Voice's Envoy of Geb - Game Thread, by Ignác Takács

Tales of Agartha: the Avalon Chronicles, by Agarthian Storyteller

Star Wars - The Covenant of Shadows, by Six

Heathy's Isle of Dread Thread, by Altai Iscarni

Battle of the Bands - A home-brew PbP campaign for Bards, by RainyDayNinja

The Academae Discussion Thread, by Fredrik

DM Aron Marczylo's Curse of the Crimson Throne - Part 3, by Curnach Daveck

Sanosuke's Mormont's Gauntlet, by Eltumal Woodsoul

Left in Sandpoint, by Durgen Grimhelm

DM Bloodgargler Serpent's Skull OOC, by DM Bloodgargler

DM Caleth's Bronze Age: An Inheritance of Dragons, by Quodak Milner

   RSS Recent Posts Facebook Twitter Email
Search
Search this Thread:


As per above:

What's the best version of Traveller?


well, because im old, i am pertty partial to the original rules


MegaTraveller!!! >:)

Ancients rock! Vilani rock! Hivers rock! Give me my FGMP... Nah, screw that. Give me my Oynssork!

But seriously, I loved their task rules. And DGP's supplements were the best any RPG system has ever gotten.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Companion, Modules Subscriber)

Tatterdemalion wrote:

MegaTraveller!!! >:)

Ancients rock! Vilani rock! Hivers rock! Give me my FGMP... Nah, screw that. Give me my Oynssork!

But seriously, I loved their task rules. And DGP's supplements were the best any RPG system has ever gotten.

I whole-heartedly agree. The only trouble I had with MegaTraveller was all of the defense/offense tables for starship combat. The DGP stuff and the task resolution system rocked.


Bill Dunn wrote:
I whole-heartedly agree. The only trouble I had with MegaTraveller was all of the defense/offense tables for starship combat. The DGP stuff and the task resolution system rocked.

I completely agree.

While Traveller starships are way-cool, MT starship rules were either way-complicated, way-crappy, or both. A sad fact for a game that so often centers around space travel.

Osirion (President, Jon Brazer Enterprises)

Mongoose. Its alot easier to find players and material. Plus its OGL. Any questions?

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber)

No love for TNE? For T4, GT, or T20? How heartbreaking [/sarcasm]. I will say that some of the supplements for GT are really good, not quite DGP good but still excellent and easier to get hold of than the DGP material.

As for me, late-model CT with the Task system integrated is very similar to Mongoose Traveller, close enough that I've been using the old Alien Modules to generate characters with no problems. I wouldn't really make much distinction between the games in terms of what I like to play.


I love the original. Granted - the Digest Group's task system definitely rocks but that is very easy to lift from MT and bring it back to CT after all that is where it started.


In before the lock!


Chello!

Have to go with either Classic or Mongoose. If you play GURPS, the G-T is excellent, otherwise, no.

And don't get me started on TNE....! ;)

Tony


Anthony Emmel wrote:
And don't get me started on TNE....! ;)

This thread is about Traveller's best -- not worst :P


Anthony Emmel wrote:

Chello!

Have to go with either Classic or Mongoose. If you play GURPS, the G-T is excellent, otherwise, no.

And don't get me started on TNE....! ;)

Tony

Having played the original rules, Megatraveller, TNE and GURPS, the best times I have had is playing GURPS Traveller. However, the were all pretty fun.


CourtFool wrote:
In before the lock!

Who let the dogs in. Now we have to get the rugs cleaned.


I don't think there's no best version of the game. If you comfortable with GURPS or d20 rules then Traveller D20 or GURPS Traveller is good.

If you're comfortable with some elements of an apocalyptic setting/time period then the New Era setting might be your cup of tea. If you prefer overall stability in the government then GURPS Traveller or Classic Traveller settings might be more your cup of tea.

Its what you want out of the rules and the setting that make Traveller great.

Mike


Qstor wrote:
I don't think there's no best version of the game. If you comfortable with GURPS or d20 rules then Traveller D20 or GURPS Traveller is good.

I agree. I don't think there's no best version -- which means I think there is a best version -- and it's MT. Just teasing :)

But I find it telling that so very few like TNE -- I'm definitely sticking with it being the worst :P

(Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, GameMastery Cards Subscriber)

GURPS Traveller was great since the GURPS system is perfect for "hard" settings and the sourcebooks were very lean and very useful, allowing you the starting playing with minimal outlay.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Companion, Modules Subscriber)

Tatterdemalion wrote:
Qstor wrote:
I don't think there's no best version of the game. If you comfortable with GURPS or d20 rules then Traveller D20 or GURPS Traveller is good.

I agree. I don't think there's no best version -- which means I think there is a best version -- and it's MT. Just teasing :)

But I find it telling that so very few like TNE -- I'm definitely sticking with it being the worst :P

I don't think T4 with its half-dice was much better, frankly. But at least it didn't have the post-virus setting. Blech!

Qadira (RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16)

(waves) A fan of TNE here. In fact, I picked up several copies of the basic rulesbook.

I really like the breadth of careers available in TNE. I like the sense of adventure, of knowing what used to be out there, but not what's been dying, or growing, out there over the last two generations.

I like the ship-to-ship combat rules (Brilliant Lances, Battle Rider, Striker II). They're clean, they integrate well into the rest of the rules system (unlike every single other version of Traveller before GURPS.)

I liked the Big Mystery carried over from MegaTraveller, the Empress Wave propagating out from the core. (It was supposed to tie psionics together with the Jump drive mechanics in a way that would have opened the Traveller universe up to strange new things.)

I liked the system. It was so much more flexible than the original rules. (And there was, finally, more than that same damned page of psionics rules!)

(And Marc Millar hated it. He hated the idea of people starting a galactic civilization. So he created T4, set in Milieu Zero, where people were starting a galactic civilization. Except with, you know, a lot more typos and crappy editing...)

--+--

I also like the spirit behind the GURPS:Traveller materials.

But not the GURPS 4th Edition TRAVELLER: Interstellar Wars. Pfah. Instead of making Earthlings smart, or industrious, or just lucky, it's made the Vilani just stupid. There are ways of weakening a foe without making them dense.

The fact that it's GURPS 4th Edition doesn't make it go down any better for me.


Chris Mortika wrote:
(waves) A fan of TNE here. In fact, I picked up several copies of the basic rulesbook...

(waves back) That's OK -- you can still hang with us! :P

PS: so nobody misunderstands, I'm only teasing about what versions are good or bad.


Chello!

And for my part, the reason I disliked TNE so much back in the day was the two major changes....change in setting and change in system. Both at tthe same time was too much to swallow.

Tony

Qadira (RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16)

Well, the MegaTraveller universe was a bloody mess, Tony.

Ther was an issue of Challenge, the GDW house organ, where the authors of TNE explained the reasons behind the shift:

The Problem with original Traveller as the MegaTraveller designers saw it:

  • Too staid. Ten thousand stars, and everybody's ship's library had all the statistics on every single planet.
  • Too settled. There wasn't much you could so except break laws. You were burglars, thieves, and looters.
  • Too much backstory for new players. (Kind of like the reasons WotC just upset the Forgotten Realms.)

The Problems with MegaTraveller as the TNE designers saw it:

  • Too chaotic. "If you're going to have a watershed event, don't role-play through it. Narrate it, and role-play the aftermath."
  • Too dark. War involves killing. Interplanetary war involves killing planets.
  • Too gray. There wasn't a "good" side to play. You picked a faction, and then felt bad when that faction was involved in war crimes and atrocities.
  • Too huge and terrible. There wsn't anything that you could actually do to impact the war. So, you were still entertaining yourself shooting people, stealing things, and looting.

So, there we were. The Archduchy of Deneb ("Behind the Claw") was still puttering along, Virus-free and quarantined. The rest of the Third Imperium was now mysterious and ripe for exploration.

As for the system:

MegaTraveller, written by the DGP people, instituted a new system, based on what was then the current Traveller rules, but with new task-management mechanics that were half-written and sort of unplayable. I don't know about you, but everybody I know who tried to play MegaTraveller just went back to using Traveller rules and played with the new univese.

This was okay for Traveller veterans, but not for anyone new to the game who picked it up and tried to actually perform any tasks in the MT system.

And GDW had this other system, originating with Twilight: 2000 and Traveller: 2300, and enriched through development with Dark Conspiracy. This system had been out for a while, worked well, and was generic enough to fit the Traveller universe.

It won Origin Awards. And it was the first version of Traveller that didn't assume that most PCs were retired military officers looking to turn to a life of crime.

But, yeah, Santa Claus in space? That was pretty dumb.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Companion, Modules Subscriber)

Chris Mortika wrote:


As for the system:

MegaTraveller, written by the DGP people, instituted a new system, based on what was then the current Traveller rules, but with new task-management mechanics that were half-written and sort of unplayable. I don't know about you, but everybody I know who tried to play MegaTraveller just went back to using Traveller rules and played with the new univese.

This was okay for Traveller veterans, but not for anyone new to the game who picked it up and tried to actually perform any tasks in the MT system.

And GDW had this other system, originating with Twilight: 2000 and Traveller: 2300, and enriched through development with Dark Conspiracy. This system had been out for a while, worked well, and was generic enough to fit the Traveller universe.

It won Origin Awards. And it was the first version of Traveller that didn't assume that most PCs were retired military officers looking to turn to a life of crime.

See, I hated TNE because it took everything original Traveller and threw it on the dungheap. I suppose a lot of people would say that's where MT was taking it too, but I don't think there was a bit that was completely unsalvageable until TNE was was well under development and the Traveller News Service started steering the MT universe in the TNE direction.

Plus, while there was always a lot of militarism in Traveller, TNE was the edition that was simply too militarized for me. Between the jargon, the default assumption of being in some neo-colonial organization, and the combat system, I was out. Way out, and terribly disappointed.

Qadira (RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16)

I certainly see your position, Bill, and there are a lot of people who agreed with you. Which is why I think the Deneb Regency sourcebook came out as far ahead of schedule as it had.

A "Shattered Imperium" with a half-dozen more-or-less stable protectorates, each claiming to be the legitimate heir to the Third Imperium, might have been a fun campaign setting, but I honestly don't think that MegaTraveller could have gotten us there, at least not after the Rebellion Sourcebook came out.

EDIT: So, did you just stick with MT then?

(Oh, and are you, by chance, coming down to ICON over the Halloween weekend?)

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Companion, Modules Subscriber)

Chris Mortika wrote:

I certainly see your position, Bill, and there are a lot of people who agreed with you. Which is why I think the Deneb Regency sourcebook came out as far ahead of schedule as it had.

A "Shattered Imperium" with a half-dozen more-or-less stable protectorates, each claiming to be the legitimate heir to the Third Imperium, might have been a fun campaign setting, but I honestly don't think that MegaTraveller could have gotten us there, at least not after the Rebellion Sourcebook came out.

So, which version of the game have you played?

Classic, MegaTraveller, GURPS, and T20. Interest in the local area seemed to just dry up with TNE. Don't have a copy of Mongoose's version yet. Interested in checking it out.

(Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Battles Case Subscriber)

Another vote for MegaTraveller.

Though Mongoose Traveller and T20 aren't half bad. I even daresay that Gateway to Destiny/995 is one of my favorite Traveller regions/milieus.

I also appreciated GT not for its rules, but some of its supplements, especially First Survey.

TNE and T4 I hate with the burning fury of 1000 spectral class O stars.

Chris Mortika wrote:


MegaTraveller, written by the DGP people, instituted a new system, based on what was then the current Traveller rules, but with new task-management mechanics that were half-written and sort of unplayable. I don't know about you, but everybody I know who tried to play MegaTraveller just went back to using Traveller rules and played with the new univese.

That's 180 degrees out of phase from where I am standing. The task system was anything but half written. It was the perfect combination of comprehensive and easy-to-use. To this day, I think it's one of the most compelling task systems going.

But we had people who took the MT rules and kept chugging away with their no-rebellion universe, plugged it in to CT adventures, etc.

(Paizo Superscriber)

I was never that fond of the T20 system. I love D&D (and now Pathfinder RPG!) but not everything needs to be shoe-horned into the same mechanics framework. I love the Gurps Traveller supplements, but I think going for either a hybrid of CT and MT or trying the new Mongoose rules are probably your best way to go.


Chris Mortika wrote:
lots of good stuff...

Chris:

That was a very good summary of why different things happened. Despite all that, my group stuck with MT through any and all new editions.

The clunky aspects of MT (task system and vehicle/starship rules) weren't a huge problem for us -- I'm pretty good handling MT rules, so the players didn't have to (just a quirk of fate, not because I'm particularly competent with such things; unfortunately, I couldn't play since I was our only Traveller GM). Also, the qualities of the MT universe you mentioned above meshed well with what my group likes.

The reset that TNE represented pretty much wiped away the things we liked, so chances were slim to none that we'd switch -- no matter how good or bad TNE might have been.

To each their own...

For what any of it's worth :)


Chris Mortika wrote:
MegaTraveller, written by the DGP people, instituted a new system, based on what was then the current Traveller rules, but with new task-management mechanics that were half-written and sort of unplayable. I don't know about you, but everybody I know who tried to play MegaTraveller just went back to using Traveller rules and played with the new univese.
Psion wrote:
That's 180 degrees out of phase from where I am standing. The task system was anything but half written. It was the perfect combination of comprehensive and easy-to-use. To this day, I think it's one of the most compelling task systems going.

I'm (almost) with both of you on this.

I love the task system. I don't think it was 'half-finished,' nor do I think it was a 'perfect combination,' but rather put out by people accustomed to it that didn't appreciate it's shortcomings -- many couldn't quite get the knack of juggling all the factors required to make it work (my guess is that playtesting was mostly internal to DGP & GDW).

But it certainly worked great for me and my group :)

Qadira (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

I played Original and MegaTraveller. Loved them both. Read but never played T20. Never got into anything else. I did play GURPS 3rd edition and ... will never read or play GURPS Traveller.

Sorry to those of you that love GURPS, and I don't lambast your game. It's simply not for me.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber)

TigerDave wrote:

I played Original and MegaTraveller. Loved them both. Read but never played T20. Never got into anything else. I did play GURPS 3rd edition and ... will never read or play GURPS Traveller.

Sorry to those of you that love GURPS, and I don't lambast your game. It's simply not for me.

I don't like playing GURPS. But don't miss out on the sourcebooks just because you don't like the system. Some of them are top notch. If you've got the budget they're worth buying. My personal top three recommendations would be Ground Forces, Sword Worlds, and Nobles.


ArchLich wrote:

As per above:

What's the best version of Traveller?

GURPS Traveller - best system, best "real" technology imho - it suxx enormously at the non-metric system, what a *$%§ idea (cubic-inches makes my head hurt).

Mongoose is good, but by far not complete enough - and the layout is one of the worst I have seen in the last years. (except maybe the new judges guild books, they are worse).

TNE has a good system, but the background was never my kind of traveller.


If you're new to Traveller you might pick of the new Mongoose rules and the Spinward Marches book. It's faithful to the Classic Traveller setting and the rules are easy to learn and use.

I have the books and I think its an improvement over Classic Traveller since there's an option *not* to have the PCs die in character generation :P

I think there's good points about the TNE and MT settings but the radical changes aren't what attracts me about Traveller. I like Dark Conspiracy so I'm not adverse to the GDW rules but just the TNE setting. I have some of the sourcebooks but only cause I like collecting Traveller materials :)

Mike

Osirion (President, Jon Brazer Enterprises)

Qstor wrote:

If you're new to Traveller you might pick of the new Mongoose rules and the Spinward Marches book. It's faithful to the Classic Traveller setting and the rules are easy to learn and use.

I have the books and I think its an improvement over Classic Traveller since there's an option *not* to have the PCs die in character generation :P

I think there's good points about the TNE and MT settings but the radical changes aren't what attracts me about Traveller. I like Dark Conspiracy so I'm not adverse to the GDW rules but just the TNE setting. I have some of the sourcebooks but only cause I like collecting Traveller materials :)

Mike

Ditto this.

Qadira (RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16)

Oh, there was always the option to have your character muster out in the middle of a tour-of-duty with some injury, instead of dying.

My favorite memory of PC death, back when we were playing classic Traveller, was about two hours into the second session, with characters we just loved. Some bad guys had stolen a McGuffin and were headed out-of-system, and we were following a half-hour behind. So our pilot decided to hit Jump Drive while we were still in a planet's gravity radius. Risky, but it would buy us the time we needed.

Roll, roll. Umm. Roll roll; roll roll. Sorry, guys, ship blows up.

And we returned to the character generation tables. And the new characters, whom we didn't love quite so much, never ever tried that maneuver.


Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Community / Gaming / Other RPGs / All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

Recent threads in Other RPGs

[Misfit Studios] Rogue Mage Kickstarter Underway



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure PathPathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Society, Pathfinder Battles, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.