Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
  About Paizo     Messageboards     News     Paizo Blog     Help/FAQ  




Pathfinder Society
SEARCH


BROWSE
Shop

Messageboards

WA, Spokane - Pathfinder (new group), 2 seconds ago by Shadowborn

Using 3.5 stuff vs using Pathfinder only stuff, 1 minute ago by CD8D

Burning magic and spell level, 1 minute ago by Crimson Jester

The Trappings of Civilization -- PbP Joust, 1 minute ago by Sir Manfred VonFalkenburg

Should Cavalier get Armor Training as Fighter have?, 2 minutes ago by Zurai

polymorphing to a monstrous humanoid, 4 minutes ago by James Risner

Wellards rescue attempt on RotRL, 4 minutes ago by Romon

Dungeons & Dragons—Monster Manual Miniatures: Savage Encounters Booster, 4 minutes ago by Kezghan

Do clerics bybass arcane spell failure from armour?, 5 minutes ago by James Risner

Ape, Tyrant, 5 minutes ago by Berselius

Voice in the Void PA Confusion (no spoiler), 6 minutes ago by redcapscorner

Smite evil and non-weapon attacks, 7 minutes ago by Zairos

New PDF once the Golarion Campaign Setting is revised?, 11 minutes ago by Watcher

Natural Weapons and Vital Strike, 11 minutes ago by James Risner

City of Nine Stars -- City of Twilight, 11 minutes ago by Last Vestige of Aroden

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Community / Gaming / D&D 3.5/d20/OGL / Ranged Disarm and Ranged Touch Spells     Recent Posts
Ranged Disarm and Ranged Touch Spells
Urizen (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Chronicles, Pathfinder Companion Subscriber),

A 2-Vonnarc-col avatar

I'm reading the Ranged Disarm feat on p 103 of Complete Warrior and I wondered if someone could use a ranged touch spell as the weapon to accomplish the task? Since you can technically use Ranged Touch as a Weapon Focus (as indicated from Complete Arcane) and this feat makes no mention of having the ranged weapon to be a physical weapon (unlike Ranged Pin and Ranged Sunder, which does specify a projectile or thrown weapon), would anyone allow this?

Picturing it in my head, it would be pretty cool to fire off a ranged touch spell to focus on disarming a melee opponent of his sword.

Sean Mahoney (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber),

A 12-Queens-Doctor avatar

To be clear, you can not choose ranged spell as a weapon focus, you can choose a Ray (which are spells, but not all ranged spells are rays). However, assuming that is what you meant in your question by ranged spell I will go on.

Complete Warrior wrote:

Choose one type of ranged weapon with which you are proficient.

You certainly are proficient with a ray, so you are good on the first sentence and can take the feat as Ranged Disarm: Ray.

Reading over the rules laid out in the Rules Compendium for Disarm, I don't see anything that would prevent a ray from being used the same as any other ranged attack.

You would need a ruling on the DM if the ray counted as two-handed, one-handed, or light for the penalty (I would suggest light, like an unarmed or natural strike) and if the size adjustment would be taken into account (since spell damage does not scale with size, I would suggest no).

Overall it seems like a really good use of 0-level spells or wands of low level rays. As you get to higher levels it would be much less useful a tactic though (as disarm is in general), but in a low level game you don't expect to progress real far this would be a option.

The downside with Ranged Disarm is that you don't get your str added to the roll as does the defendant and you have a poor BAB... the fact that the ray was a touch attack doesn't mean anything to the disarm attempt.

Sean Mahoney

Daniel Moyer,

314 avatar

Sean Mahoney wrote:
To be clear, you can not choose ranged spell as a weapon focus, you can choose a Ray (which are spells, but not all ranged spells are rays). However, assuming that is what you meant in your question by ranged spell I will go on.

The Complete Arcane says there are 2 examples... 'Ranged Touch Spell' and 'Melee Touch Spell' for purposes of using Weapon Focus. (ex: Weapon Focus: Ranged Touch Spell)

I apologize as that isn't verbatim(no book at work), but point being it's does not have to be specific such as RAY, ORB, etc. according to the rules I'm familiar with. Is it different in PF CORE or some other source?

Dogbert,

Avatar V avatar

Let' seee.....

Complete Arcane doesn't mention categories for "weaponlike spells", but Tome and Blood divides them in Ray (Disintegrate, Ennervation, etc), Energy Missile (Melf's Acid Arrow, Electric Orb, etc), and Touch (Ghoul Touch, Chill Touch, etc).

Hope that helps. :)

Dogbert,

Avatar V avatar

Also.

While Str won't apply to a Ray or Energy Missile spell in disarm, the +4 from Improved Disarm (and perhaps a +1 from Weapon Focus if you allow it) combined with Bard and Cleric buffs should carry him through the way to midgame at least. =)

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Community / Gaming / D&D 3.5/d20/OGL / Ranged Disarm and Ranged Touch Spells All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in, or create a new account.



©2002–2009 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Chronicles, Pathfinder Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Society, PAIZOCON, RPG Superstar, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Amazing Stories is a trademark of, and Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.