Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop

Messageboards

Paizo Kickstarter?, by thunderspirit

Ring of Sustanance: Gimmick or Awesome Sauce?, by Son of the Veterinarian

Last one to post wins, by Grand Magus

Most awesome first attack I've ever seen, by rando1000

Lootable Items: Boars carrying +5 Vorpal Chain-Swords or something more realistic?, by Blaeringr

Please Do Away With 7-Person Tables, by Chot

[HHG] Languages in Pathfinder, by Tom Baumbach

What monsters would fit in well in Louisiana?, by Son of the Veterinarian

>>Ask *James Jacobs* ALL your Questions Here!<<, by James Jacobs

Laru, by Eric Morton

Help me munchkin it up!, by BigCoffee

New PFS Magus - advice and help welcome :), by Magnus Arcanis

Defending Weapon, by Caius

Changes for Guide 4.2, by Eric Clingenpeel

Adventure Path Feedback, by Toadkiller Dog

Online Campaigns

Megan's Kingmaker PbP, by Barnabus

Sanosuke's Mormont's Gauntlet, by Shanosuke

Evart High Pathfinder Club Discussion, by Aman110

PFS First Steps by Xzaral, by Jiece Dragonius

Tomb of the Emperor Gods -- PbP, by Tarren the Dungeon Master

The_Ninja_DM's Carrion Crown, by The_Ninja_DM

SMG's Kingmaker PbP, by GM SMG

Tales of Agartha: the Avalon Chronicles, by Ephebe

The Story of the Stone: Kyrademon's Jade Regent PBP, Part III, by liothonae cromvathar

Dain's King Maker Chronicles, by Erdane Winthrope

Zelghast Incident, by Deiros

Shanosuke's Souls of Lost Aridia, by Catalina_Hakîm

DM Barcas - First Steps (PFS), by Quintus Valorian

Call of the Wardens Discussion, by Roshan

DM Stephens Serpents Skull Campaign PBP Chapter 1: Smugglers Shiv, by Corbius Jank

   RSS Recent Posts Facebook Twitter Email
Note: Talk about 4th Edition here. Politely. Personal attacks or insults directed at other members of the Paizo community, or other companies in the industry, will not be tolerated.

Search
Search this Thread:

101 to 150 of 221 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>

crosswiredmind wrote:

Razz,

Any serious shop owner that does not stock 4E is going to miss out on a serious chunck of sales - especially given the details on the OGL.

you do work Wotc...;)

btw I have three FLGS that I go to and none of them are getting 4th edition. Why? because they still have a slew of 1st,2nd,3rd and 3.5 collecting dust on the shelves, each shop does huge on card game events and DDM games and two of the shops sell comics books and like merchandise.


crosswiredmind wrote:

4E will sell no matter what any of us think or feel about it.

That has yet to happen. Who knows? But modules that are $29.99 a pop are not going to fly off the shelf, when X-box and Playstations(Games) prices continue to drop, not to many kids/teenagers are rakin in big bucks to slap down on a book with very little replay value. "What should I get ShadowCrack Keep or Assassin's Creed"...


DangerDwarf wrote:
Kids are pretty free with mommy and daddy's money.

Some spoiled brats are free with mommy and daddy's money and if the parents are there and they are victums of Wotc Machination=(A crafty scheme or cunning design for the accomplishment of a sinister end.) The parents will reply "How bout a X-box game, I got D&D at home in a box in the attic/basement".


Tobus Neth wrote:
they are victums of Wotc Machination

Ah, Children of the Spurned. Innocents turned into Console Zombies by the anger their parents feel for a game company.


DangerDwarf wrote:
Tobus Neth wrote:
they are victums of Wotc Machination

Ah, Children of the Spurned. Innocents turned into Console Zombies by the anger their parents feel for a game company.

My son plays D&D 3.5 with me.. he is starting up a game with his buddies soon...he hardly ever plays video games. Yes my dig at Wotc is more of a humorous shot/slap etc...


Tobus Neth wrote:
DangerDwarf wrote:
Tobus Neth wrote:
they are victums of Wotc Machination

Ah, Children of the Spurned. Innocents turned into Console Zombies by the anger their parents feel for a game company.

My son plays D&D 3.5 with me.. he is starting up a game with his buddies soon...he hardly ever plays video games. Yes my dig at Wotc is more of a humorous shot/slap etc...

Yeah, same with mine on the Console Zombies.

Oddly, both of my kids completely ignore our game system (not that I'm complaining). They're very into board games though.

Qadira (RPG Superstar 2009 Top 8)

Tobus Neth wrote:
DangerDwarf wrote:
Tobus Neth wrote:
they are victums of Wotc Machination

Ah, Children of the Spurned. Innocents turned into Console Zombies by the anger their parents feel for a game company.

My son plays D&D 3.5 with me.. he is starting up a game with his buddies soon...he hardly ever plays video games. Yes my dig at Wotc is more of a humorous shot/slap etc...

Yes, my son as well. He's vehemently opposed to 4e unless Greyhawk is given its due. I'm not that interested in it but will wait and see.

How does Tobus Neth JR. feel about 4e?


crosswiredmind wrote:
sandwiches wrote:
Not to sound like a complete unethical sob...
Too late - stealing is stealing.

And WotC stole the soul of a wonderful hobby from me, because if I ever do decide to try out 4E with my players, I sure as hell am not spending another $2000, that's for damn sure.

crosswiredmind wrote:

Razz,

Any serious shop owner that does not stock 4E is going to miss out on a serious chunck of sales - especially given the details on the OGL.

Did you read my last post? Many, most of them regulars, at my local hobby shop REFUSE to buy into 4th Edition. They're all enjoying 3.5E too much (some still play 2E, in fact) and they're tired of WotC's machinations and destruction of the game.

It has gotten to the point where they call WotC Nazis (because it seems that's how they are with D&D and it also rhymes, since they phoenetically say WotC).

In other words, the books will not sell at his shop if most of the customers refuse to even bother with 4th Edition. It'd be a complete waste.


Tarren Dei wrote:
He's vehemently opposed to 4e unless Greyhawk is given its due.

Not trying to take anything from Paizo, but I don't really think that Greyhawk received its due in 3e.


Razz wrote:

It has gotten to the point where they call WotC Nazis (because it seems that's how they are with D&D and it also rhymes, since they phoenetically say WotC).

Razz, no disrespect, but do you yourself work for WOTC?

The way you froth at the mouth and throw around words like "Nazi", you're really not making 3.5 players look good. Seriously, I wouldn't be surprised if people read your posts and think to themselves "Man, if that's the company I'll be keeping if I stay with 3.5 I might as well go and switch to 4.0."
Honestly, if you really like 3.5, and if you want others to keep playing that system, you're really not doing yourself any favors. I myself have no desire to switch to 4.0 but you've halfway convinced me to give it a chance.
You might wanna dial it down a notch.

Qadira (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Modules Subscriber)

Yeah, the N... word upsets a lot of people on these boards. Don't use it unless you want your message lost in a load of condemnatory flaming.


Tarren Dei wrote:


How does Tobus Neth JR. feel about 4e?

My grognards views/style have rubbed off on him.


sandwiches wrote:
Not to sound like a complete unethical sob...
crosswiredmind wrote:
Too late - stealing is stealing.

That doesn't mean he's wrong. There will be site rips available for download in the usual places, I expect.

And have our politicians taught us nothing? Ethical behaviour is highly overrated. ;)


So it starts.

So much for the "DDI isn't necessary" part.

I really doubt that the half-orc will be the only classic part of D&D that will end up there.

And while you sure can steal this stuff, ethical or not (isn't alignment abolished in 4e? They're promoting dealing with the devil as a cool thing. I think we all agree that virtual theft is a lot more harmless than supporting the Adversary, so they can't even complain ;-)), there's something worse to consider:

I'm quite sure this stuff won't end up on the SRD. That means that they will not be available for Paizo or Nocromancer games. Of course, they will probably be able to make their own versions of half-orcs - unless Wizards tries to argue that it's closed IP and may not be copied.

I think this has changed my opinion about 4e from "only if Paizo supports it" to "not even if Paizo supports it".

Tatterdemalion wrote:


This seems a bit disingenuous. Aren't they having to retcon various elements of FR to make it 4/e compatible -- regardless of what earlier editions did?

They don't retcon anything. They kill off races, deities and nations left and right to force FR into 4e's baking-tin


Tarren Dei wrote:
He's vehemently opposed to 4e unless Greyhawk is given its due.
DangerDwarf wrote:
Not trying to take anything from Paizo, but I don't really think that Greyhawk received its due in 3e.

And if what they've done to the Forgotten Realms is any indication, you should feel lucky that WotC have not done anything with Greyhawk for 4e.


hmarcbower wrote:
Tarren Dei wrote:
He's vehemently opposed to 4e unless Greyhawk is given its due.
DangerDwarf wrote:
Not trying to take anything from Paizo, but I don't really think that Greyhawk received its due in 3e.
And if what they've done to the Forgotten Realms is any indication, you should feel lucky that WotC have not done anything with Greyhawk for 4e.

Hah! No doubt.

While I plan on picking up the new FR, I honestly feel for the FR fans. I've got no vested interest in the setting so I can peruse it out of curiosity.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, GameMastery Cards Subscriber)

Aubrey the Malformed wrote:
Yeah, the N... word upsets a lot of people on these boards.

Yes, it does. Nazi comparisons are never appropriate, no matter what the context. Please just don´t use them.

Stefan


Razz wrote:
crosswiredmind wrote:
sandwiches wrote:
Not to sound like a complete unethical sob...
Too late - stealing is stealing.
And WotC stole the soul of a wonderful hobby from me, because if I ever do decide to try out 4E with my players, I sure as hell am not spending another $2000, that's for damn sure.

So you justify breaking the law because a company changed a game you like to play ... you know a hobby. It is this kind of irrational statement that makes the haters look bad.

Razz wrote:
crosswiredmind wrote:

Razz,

Any serious shop owner that does not stock 4E is going to miss out on a serious chunck of sales - especially given the details on the OGL.

Did you read my last post? Many, most of them regulars, at my local hobby shop REFUSE to buy into 4th Edition. They're all enjoying 3.5E too much (some still play 2E, in fact) and they're tired of WotC's machinations and destruction of the game.

So your tore is owned by someone that wants to cut off potential sales in his or her area because the small cadre of regulars refuse to buy 4E.

Have you ever worked at a game shop? The regulars are always there but a whole lot of sales come through people that just pop in from time to time, buy their games, and head back to their groups. When 2E came out we met dozens of people that played whom we had never met before - a couple of them became regulars.

Razz wrote:
It has gotten to the point where they call WotC Nazis (because it seems that's how they are with D&D and it also rhymes, since they phoenetically say WotC).

And there it is ...

You have now crossed the line of civility and rationality. You belittle the victims of the holocaust by comparing a game company to one of, if not the greatest evils ever to have plagued humanity. Wizards of the Coast did not formulate mass killings. They are not supporters of state sponsored racism. The do not use horrific violence to destroy their competition.

This is so far beyond the red line that I have lost any shred of respect I have had for your contribution to these boards.


I wouldn't be surprise to see action figures (based on 4e) released by christmas time 2008 or sometime next year, the races and classes sketches to me seem like productions sketches for a toy line. And it will be another push for them to draw in buyers of 4e products. World of Warcraft now has action figures...it only a matter of time before Dual-slashing scimitar action Drizzt, the action figure package will come with stats on the back of the package card..Hasbro is a toy company...

(RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8)

Tobus Neth wrote:
I wouldn't be surprise to see action figures (based on 4e) released by christmas time 2008 or sometime next year, the races and classes sketches to me seem like productions sketches for a toy line. And it will be another push for them to draw in buyers of 4e products. World of Warcraft now has action figures...it only a matter of time before Dual-slashing scimitar action Drizzt, the action figure package will come with stats on the back of the package card..Hasbro is a toy company...

Funny thing is, I'd rather buy a well done 4.x tiefling or (blue) dragonborn action figure than 4.x

It would be a good marketing idea though.


That would be sweet. I still have my old AD&D action figures.


DangerDwarf wrote:
That would be sweet. I still have my old AD&D action figures.

Orcus Skull mountain playset!


The old AD&D owlbear action figure was one of the coolest things ever.

Edit: Der..I mean Hook Horror.

Get it right dwarf! I typed bugbear the 1st time for sme reason.

Need.

More.

Coffee.


Tobus Neth wrote:
DangerDwarf wrote:
That would be sweet. I still have my old AD&D action figures.
Orcus Skull mountain playset!

That would go well with my Fortress of Fangs set.


As a side note, Warduke was awesome. I remember making him the villain of a game back when I was running BECMI. He and Bargle teamed up to smackdown my players.


crosswiredmind wrote:
So you justify breaking the law because a company changed a game you like to play ... you know a hobby. It is this kind of irrational statement that makes the haters look bad.

No it doesn't. What would make 4e haters look bad is if f4ns irrationally attributed that one aspect to the whole group.

Which if one were to go looking for a reason to dismiss an opinion in conflict with their own out of hand is exactly what one would do.


DangerDwarf wrote:

As a side note, Warduke was awesome. I remember making him the villain of a game back when I was running BECMI. He and Bargle teamed up to smackdown my players.

I was Warduke in BECMI D&D. >:)


Antioch wrote:
Half-orcs are not necessary to play D&D, or even necessary for a "traditional" feel to the game. They are not forcing you to pay-to-play, because in all honesty if you want a half-orc right out of the gate I'm sure plenty of players will make their own race mechanics for it. Not hard.

For you they may not be "traditional" but for a great many people (especially those who started with 3E they are).

Antioch wrote:
...As for the gnomes? Well, they're in the game, so please find something else to whine about. I'm glad myself that they took the time to work on the gnome to make it different rather than include it "just 'cause" and end up with a Small-sized dwarf.

While they may be in the game I now have to buy two books (PHB and MM) as opposed to just one (PHB) in order to play them. Besides that we have no guarantee that the version that appears in the MM will be as detailed and have as many options as the full PHB races will.

Antioch wrote:
...As for the tin-foil delusion that DDI is necessary to play the game, you have yet to show me any instance where Wizards is witholding even remotely crucial game mechanics that I otherwise could not game without. Half-orcs are not critical to the game.

Other individuals feel that half-orcs are essential to the game and I for one do not like the fact that all of the material that was once free on the WoTC site will now be a part of the DDI.

Antioch wrote:


The only real issue that I can find in this sea of irrational hatred is for the players who happen to be running a half-orc AND were intending to play in 4th Edition in the first place (see, if you werent going to because you hate Wizards for whatever reason, then griping about it really doesnt count).
For them, I'm sure someone will crank out a quality 3rd-party stat block to use until an official one comes out, in which case I'm sure it'll make it onto the internet anyway.

Many people want to know why they should have to wait for a 3rd-party publisher to provide them with information and options that use to be provided in the PHB?

Does WoTC need to provide everything in the initial launch? Obviously no. But a decent explanation as why they are not including them would be nice (without telling us to go buy a book).

Lastly, people have every right to be upset about the changes. They obviously like the game and have invested money in it so they should be concerned when there are changes they don't like.

Cheliax (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber)

Tobus Neth wrote:
I wouldn't be surprise to see action figures (based on 4e) released by christmas time 2008 or sometime next year, the races and classes sketches to me seem like productions sketches for a toy line. And it will be another push for them to draw in buyers of 4e products. World of Warcraft now has action figures...it only a matter of time before Dual-slashing scimitar action Drizzt, the action figure package will come with stats on the back of the package card..Hasbro is a toy company...

I think that they will be the new look for the D&D Miniatures line.

Keep in mind that with Dungeons of Dread, the DDM rules will also switch to version 2.0, which is quite probably as much a rehaul of the old, convoluted rules, as an adaptation to the 4E gaming structure (AC and reflex saves we've already seen in the promo card for the Spined Devil).

Some old critters have already received a graphic "modernization" such as the Bone Devil/Osyluth (ugly), the Green Dragon (ugly, with the nose horn), and the Feral Troll (on steroids for the feral template).


Here's the rub. WotC says that you don't need to subscribe to DDI if you want to play the game, unless you want to play a half-orc. Then it will be unless you want to play a (insert core class here), then it will be another core race, then this feat that should be core, etc., etc.


Cory Stafford 29 wrote:
Here's the rub. WotC says that you don't need to subscribe to DDI if you want to play the game, unless you want to play a half-orc. Then it will be unless you want to play a (insert core class here), then it will be another core race, then this feat that should be core, etc., etc.

DDI is a premium service just like Dragon and Dungeon. If you wanted to use material in Dragon or Dungeon you had to pay money. Heck if you want to use any game content (without stealing it) you have to pay money and that has been true since the original.


crosswiredmind wrote:
Cory Stafford 29 wrote:
Here's the rub. WotC says that you don't need to subscribe to DDI if you want to play the game, unless you want to play a half-orc. Then it will be unless you want to play a (insert core class here), then it will be another core race, then this feat that should be core, etc., etc.
DDI is a premium service just like Dragon and Dungeon. If you wanted to use material in Dragon or Dungeon you had to pay money. Heck if you want to use any game content (without stealing it) you have to pay money and that has been true since the original.

Good point...

Want to use the Archer class under 1e? Own Best of Dragon 1 or the issue it came out in.

Want to use the Illusionist Bard? BoD III (IIRC) or the Dragon it came in.

I wonder - do they have a "monthly access" option or do you have to subscribe for a year+ to use DDI?

Probably require a 1 year sub, unless they've got time-limited downloads, or someone could buy one month a year, download everything, then wait another 12-18 months to get it all...

It's what I'd do! :D


crosswiredmind wrote:
DDI is a premium service just like Dragon and Dungeon. If you wanted to use material in Dragon or Dungeon you had to pay money. Heck if you want to use any game content (without stealing it) you have to pay money and that has been true since the original.

The problem that most posters seem to have with this, is being sold "extras" that have previously been core. Purchasing the old magazines for extra content was great because you usually received something completely different from "core"(tibbits, battle dancer etc..)

*I am one of those "undecided" about 4th. My players don't even care what edition we play. It's one of those things where the more I hear about 4th, the more excited I get(faster gameplay, combined skills etc). The more I see about 4th, the less excited I get(tieflings, dragonborn, DDI, etc). Haha!


Exactly. I fully expect to pay for several extra books to play a dragonwrought kobold hexblade or a goliath ninja, but it seems ridiculous to need two PHBs and a DDI subscription to play something as basic as a half-orc barbarian.


Cory Stafford 29 wrote:
Exactly. I fully expect to pay for several extra books to play a dragonwrought kobold hexblade or a goliath ninja, but it seems ridiculous to need two PHBs and a DDI subscription to play something as basic as a half-orc barbarian.

I can't play something as basic as a half-orc barbarian with just my AD&D PHB =(

I can't play something as basic as a half-orc OR barbarian with just my 2nd Edition PHB =(

I can't play something as basic as a half-orc barbarian with just my Rules Cyclopedia either. =(

*shakes fist at all those games*


crosswiredmind wrote:
Razz wrote:
crosswiredmind wrote:
sandwiches wrote:
Not to sound like a complete unethical sob...
Too late - stealing is stealing.
And WotC stole the soul of a wonderful hobby from me, because if I ever do decide to try out 4E with my players, I sure as hell am not spending another $2000, that's for damn sure.
So you justify breaking the law because a company changed a game you like to play ... you know a hobby. It is this kind of irrational statement that makes the haters look bad.

Just remember that breaking the law is not necessarily unethical or immoral. Specially when in this generation the morality of information "piracy" is changing rapidly. I wonder how the kids who are now used to downloading every song, book, picture, game, etc for free will behave as adults.

I just bought about $55 worth of Paizo's item cards and other crap through dicepool (sorry guys, but it was cheaper) and I will gladly shell out more cash for more quality material from them. However, the growing population of "pirates" is a reality and I'm not sure how companies that rely on merely selling information will survive. Selling a physical product is not the same as selling information, whether we want to accept it or not. Now, whether you or I think downloading information without paying for it is right or wrong is not what's at issue here. The real problem is that more and more people are finding it unjust, unfair, or merely unnecessary to pay for merely information.

101 to 150 of 221 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Community / Gaming / D&D 4th Edition / All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure PathPathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Society, Pathfinder Battles, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.