Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop

Messageboards

Why are barbarians barbarians and not berzerkers?, by Aelryinth

Buckler + potion or buckler + scroll, by braingamer47

What are some things about the Pathfinder rules that you think most people do not know?, by Horselord

Paizo Blog: Revenge of the FAQ Attack!, by Stynkk

Goblinworks Blog: LFG! (Looking for Group!), by Daniel Powell 318

Why all the Fighter hate?, by Aelryinth

Changes to PS scenarios., by Starglim

A GM's Plight: my players / characters can't seem to get along, by Alex Head

>>Ask *James Jacobs* ALL your Questions Here!<<, by Thomas LeBlanc

What monsters would fit in well in Louisiana?, by Chuck Wright

[Jon Brazer Enterprises] Book of the River Nations: Complete Player's Reference for Kingdom Building (PFRPG), by Laithoron

Chrono Trigger!, by Ksorkrax

I give you my second attempt to fix armor bonded: The Cataphract, by Grathel

Help with 4th level Alchemist, by Mergy

Archetypes that replace a proficiency gained and multi-classing, by Starglim

Online Campaigns

Worldwound Adventures Discussion, by Stiehl9s

Sfounder's Curse of the Crimson Throne PbP, by Thorgrym the Tracker

The Story of the Stone: Kyrademon's Jade Regent PBP, Part III, by Kyrademon

Gm Wu's "The war within" Gameplay, by GM_wu

Gangs of Absalom Meeting Room, by GM Gangsta Kingpin

DM Aron Marczylo's Kingmaker - Part 1: Stolen Land, by Sir Bronwyn Raslov

DM Wellards RotRL chapter two... The Skinsaw Murders, by Alisebett

Call of the Wardens Discussion, by Dolelan Callennan

Of Battle, Wolves and Winter., by GM Drachenfels

The Heroes of Brindin's Ford - Discussion, by loimprevisto

randall793's Three Days to Kill, by Wesh Velker

GM Fnord's PFS First Steps Discussion, by Talhaearn

Crimson Throne of Lore, by Caulder Baradin

The Heroes of Brindin's Ford - Gameplay, by loimprevisto

Runelords, by DM Wrath

   RSS Recent Posts Facebook Twitter Email
Note: Talk about 4th Edition here. Politely. Personal attacks or insults directed at other members of the Paizo community, or other companies in the industry, will not be tolerated.

Search
Search this Thread:

51 to 100 of 109 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>

bugleyman wrote:
...blah blah blah.... going to ENWorld...

Nobody here is trying to drive you away. But to be perfectly honest it was you who over-reacted not FH who was itching for a rumble - so don't hack at us over it.

Anyway. We'll miss you. Please write!

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules Subscriber)

Kruelaid wrote:
bugleyman wrote:
...blah blah blah.... going to ENWorld...

Nobody here is trying to drive you away. But to be perfectly honest it was you who over-reacted not FH who was itching for a rumble - so don't hack at us over it.

Anyway. We'll miss you. Please write!

Sigh.

DId he overreact? Probably.

Did the people responding to him make this community seem better or worse?

Taldor (RPG Superstar 2011 Top 16)

Dunno? We could always go out back and duel?

(Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Companion, Modules Subscriber)

Daeglin wrote:
Did the people responding to him make this community seem better or worse?

I dunno. Did he make the community seem better or worse?

See, that's my big b!tch with this kind of logic, only those who have something deviating from the "Gee, ain't WotC great" mindset have to worry about watching what they say. If you're posting in the discussion, you're making yourself part of the community. No one's holding a gun to anyone's head making them post or take an argumentative attitude (regardless of which side of the aisle you argue from).

It's a two-way street, brother.

(Pathfinder Charter Superscriber)

I've been reading the thread over on ENWorld about the GSL and it seems a little... scary.

http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=224085

Shadow Lodge (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion Subscriber)

Nyarlathotep wrote:

I've been reading the thread over on ENWorld about the GSL and it seems a little... scary.

http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=224085

Link

(Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Battles Case Subscriber)

Nyarlathotep wrote:

I've been reading the thread over on ENWorld about the GSL and it seems a little... scary.

http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=224085

Yeah. And some say, provisions targeted straight at Paizo. Once you GSL, you lose it if you publish OGL again.

In short, you publish GSL 4e or continue to publish OGL 3e, not both.


Psion wrote:
Nyarlathotep wrote:

I've been reading the thread over on ENWorld about the GSL and it seems a little... scary.

http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=224085

Yeah. And some say, provisions targeted straight at Paizo. Once you GSL, you lose it if you publish OGL again.

In short, you publish GSL 4e or continue to publish OGL 3e, not both.

Yep. Means that Sinister Adventures is not going to be embracing 4E. I plan to offer my adventures in as many systems as possible. If I can't do that and do 4E, then I can't do 4E.

Cheliax (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules Subscriber)

Nicolas Logue wrote:


Yep. Means that Sinister Adventures is not going to be embracing 4E. I plan to offer my adventures in as many systems as possible. If I can't do that and do 4E, then I can't do 4E.

[Emphasis mine]

That's telling them, Nick.


Fake Healer wrote:


Ahhh, that clears that up, I had heard a few differing stories, some of which involved pre-pubescent otters, and was hoping you would clarify the terms.
Don't worry, I am sure the GSL will be out soon. *tries to keep a straight face*

Oh, all the stories you heard about the pre-pubescent otters are 100% true! ;-)

In the meantime...I'll be Sinister and make Golems! I'm not too concerned one way or the other.


Eh, never bought much 3rd party stuff in the first place.

Qadira (Pathfinder Charter Superscriber)

The inability to publish both GSL and OGL material makes the partnership between Necro and Paizo look like an increasingly smart long-term strategic move - my respect for Paizo management seems to increase on a weekly basis!


Shelbrune88 wrote:
The inability to publish both GSL and OGL material makes the partnership between Necro and Paizo look like an increasingly smart long-term strategic move - my respect for Paizo management seems to increase on a weekly basis!

Make no mistake. Lisa is a GENIUS. I kid you not.

Erik is a mastermind as well. I've had about a grand total of 20 discussions with Erik about gaming, the industy, publishing, etc. Each one I walk away with a dozen pure GEMS of brilliance. The guy should be in charge of something awesome...oh wait he is.


Viktor_Von_Doom wrote:
Eh, never bought much 3rd party stuff in the first place.

I'll never understand this viewpoint. Why is the "official" stamp so important? The best WotC books (IMHO) are written by Paizo's peeps (James Jacobs' name on a book guarantees my money). Why does the writing have to be through the official brand to be any good?

I should say that I am not limiting the above comments to RPGS. I'm talking about everything from clothing to toilet paper too. I buy quality, I could care less who makes the stuff.

If an awesome book is published by Wizards, I pick it up. If an awesome book is published by Green Ronin, I pick it up. If an awesome book is published by Joe Jenkins in his garage, I pick it up.

Just my personal opinion of course.

Paizo Employee (Creative Director)

Nicolas Logue wrote:

If an awesome book is published by Joe Jenkins in his garage, I pick it up.

Just my personal opinion of course.

I've always been a big fan of Jenkins's work.

Wait. You were talking about JOE Jenknis, not Brown Jenkins. Nevermind.


James Jacobs wrote:
Nicolas Logue wrote:

If an awesome book is published by Joe Jenkins in his garage, I pick it up.

Just my personal opinion of course.

I've always been a big fan of Jenkins's work.

Wait. You were talking about JOE Jenknis, not Brown Jenkins. Nevermind.

I love that little Rat Daemon...

Jason

Paizo Employee (Creative Director)

Jason Bulmahn wrote:


I love that little Rat Daemon...

Jason

Good. Cause I may have just accidentally left your address down low where it might have maybe been noticed by him. You might wanna wear your iron breastplate again tonight as you sleep.


James Jacobs wrote:
Jason Bulmahn wrote:


I love that little Rat Daemon...

Jason

Good. Cause I may have just accidentally left your address down low where it might have maybe been noticed by him. You might wanna wear your iron breastplate again tonight as you sleep.

Great.. you know how that thing itches... but I guess it is better than itching from the inside.

Jason

(BTW James and Nick, nice to see that the two of you are also up watching the craziness unfold.. fun fun...)


Jason Bulmahn wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
Jason Bulmahn wrote:


I love that little Rat Daemon...

Jason

Good. Cause I may have just accidentally left your address down low where it might have maybe been noticed by him. You might wanna wear your iron breastplate again tonight as you sleep.

Great.. you know how that thing itches... but I guess it is better than itching from the inside.

Jason

(BTW James and Nick, nice to see that the two of you are also up watching the craziness unfold.. fun fun...)

Where there is craziness...my kielbasa leadeth me...always. ;-)

Edit: I'm just sad my kielbasa led me into Brown Jenkins!!! :-0

Paizo Employee (Creative Director)

Jason Bulmahn wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
Jason Bulmahn wrote:


I love that little Rat Daemon...

Jason

Good. Cause I may have just accidentally left your address down low where it might have maybe been noticed by him. You might wanna wear your iron breastplate again tonight as you sleep.

Great.. you know how that thing itches... but I guess it is better than itching from the inside.

Jason

(BTW James and Nick, nice to see that the two of you are also up watching the craziness unfold.. fun fun...)

Hells yeah! Who can sleep when the whole gaming world is all topsy-turvy! That... and it's hardly even 3:00 AM yet. Who can be sleepy before that?

Paizo Employee (Creative Director)

Nicolas Logue wrote:
Where there is craziness...my kielbasa leadeth me...always. ;-)

That's what I dig about you, Nick. You always have such family-friendly comments that can't be misinterpreted in subversive ways. You say things EVERYONE can enjoy!


James Jacobs wrote:
Jason Bulmahn wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
Jason Bulmahn wrote:


I love that little Rat Daemon...

Jason

Good. Cause I may have just accidentally left your address down low where it might have maybe been noticed by him. You might wanna wear your iron breastplate again tonight as you sleep.

Great.. you know how that thing itches... but I guess it is better than itching from the inside.

Jason

(BTW James and Nick, nice to see that the two of you are also up watching the craziness unfold.. fun fun...)

Hells yeah! Who can sleep when the whole gaming world is all topsy-turvy! That... and it's hardly even 3:00 AM yet. Who can be sleepy before that?

Ha! Its approaching 5:00 am for me!!! ROCK!

Edit: And by ROCK! I think its safe to assume: GUAYAKI!


James Jacobs wrote:
Nicolas Logue wrote:
Where there is craziness...my kielbasa leadeth me...always. ;-)
That's what I dig about you, Nick. You always have such family-friendly comments that can't be misinterpreted in subversive ways. You say things EVERYONE can enjoy!

And you didn't even catch my edit yet! ;-)

Paizo Employee (Creative Director)

Nicolas Logue wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
Nicolas Logue wrote:
Where there is craziness...my kielbasa leadeth me...always. ;-)
That's what I dig about you, Nick. You always have such family-friendly comments that can't be misinterpreted in subversive ways. You say things EVERYONE can enjoy!
And you didn't even catch my edit yet! ;-)

Hot.


James Jacobs wrote:
Nicolas Logue wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
Nicolas Logue wrote:
Where there is craziness...my kielbasa leadeth me...always. ;-)
That's what I dig about you, Nick. You always have such family-friendly comments that can't be misinterpreted in subversive ways. You say things EVERYONE can enjoy!
And you didn't even catch my edit yet! ;-)
Hot.

IM?

Edit: And by IM? I think it's safe to assume I mean a peanut butter sandwich!

Paizo Employee (Creative Director)

Nicolas Logue wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
Nicolas Logue wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
Nicolas Logue wrote:
Where there is craziness...my kielbasa leadeth me...always. ;-)
That's what I dig about you, Nick. You always have such family-friendly comments that can't be misinterpreted in subversive ways. You say things EVERYONE can enjoy!
And you didn't even catch my edit yet! ;-)
Hot.

IM?

Edit: And I by IM? I think it's safe to assume I mean cyber-blow-job!

Ladies and Gentlemen! The thread has officially been DERAILED! Let's hear a round of applause for our resident maniac and future "Energetic Guy Who Sits Down The Hall," NICK LOGUE!


Go nick


Whoa! You totally changed what I posted when you quoted me!!! ;-)

Edit: I love the Edit function!!! :-)


James Jacobs wrote:
Nicolas Logue wrote:

Whoa! You totally changed what I posted when you quoted me!!! ;-)

Edit: I love the Edit function!!! :-)

No one's fooled! We all know what you REALLY mean when you talk about peanut butter sandwiches. Just look at the first 3 syllables alone! Pervert.

Public Broadcasting Station...yeah, that IS sick.

::Goes to work on Big Bird with a Snuffuffagus strap on::


seekerofshadowlight wrote:
Go nick

Thanks seeker!

Paizo Employee (Creative Director)

Nicolas Logue wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
Nicolas Logue wrote:

Whoa! You totally changed what I posted when you quoted me!!! ;-)

Edit: I love the Edit function!!! :-)

No one's fooled! We all know what you REALLY mean when you talk about peanut butter sandwiches. Just look at the first 3 syllables alone! Pervert.

Public Broadcasting Station...yeah, that IS sick.

::Goes to work on Big Bird with a Snuffuffagus strap on::

I said syllables, not letters, you!

Pea. Nut. Butt. (er sandwich)

Wow. Now I have to point out your own filth to you, man. You're TOO CLOSE!


James Jacobs wrote:
Nicolas Logue wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
Nicolas Logue wrote:

Whoa! You totally changed what I posted when you quoted me!!! ;-)

Edit: I love the Edit function!!! :-)

No one's fooled! We all know what you REALLY mean when you talk about peanut butter sandwiches. Just look at the first 3 syllables alone! Pervert.

Public Broadcasting Station...yeah, that IS sick.

::Goes to work on Big Bird with a Snuffuffagus strap on::

I said syllables, not letters, you!

Pea. Nut. Butt. (er sandwich)

Wow. Now I have to point out your own filth to you, man. You're TOO CLOSE!

LOL!

And on that note...I must SLEEEEEEP...with Big Bird...and my sandwich...! :-)

G'night James!

G'night EVERYONE!


*Backs away from the thread*


FabesMinis wrote:
*Backs away from the thread*

run away! run away!


Bray Abbitt wrote:
FabesMinis wrote:
*Backs away from the thread*
run away! run away!

But...I must watch...so compelling... I'm...now...talking like...William...Shat...ner...

Cheliax (Paizo Charter Superscriber, Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber)

Go to bed, guys :)


It's morning here! I don't wanna go back yet...


What a shame. I like much what the designers have come up with for 4e. Hate what the lawyers have come up with for 4e. It's as if Microsoft banned third party vendors from producing software to run on Vista if they make software for XP, or Mac, or anything except Vista.

A license that effectively locks out any independently minded company, including talent like Paizo and Sinister, from producing for fourth edition? Thank god neither of them held their breath waiting on this document.

Some of the execs at Wizards/Hasbro really seem to be doing everything in their power to make me not want to buy 4th edition. I'm going to have to think about the possibility of canceling those preorders. I'm really thinking I'm going to feel better about sending that money to Paizo, Open Design, and Sinister instead.


DudeMonkey wrote:
At this point, there's no evidence to think that the license will strangle 3rd parties.

How wrong was I here?


Nicolas Logue wrote:
I'll never understand this viewpoint. Why is the "official" stamp so important?

I'll venture a guess here, I used to be the same way.

The "official" stamp is an assumed badge of quality. There could be many different reasons behind this assumption. I, personally, used to think that the company that produced the "official" branded stuff had a better grasp of the system, and where it was going. That while others might put out good stuff, they weren't knowledgeable enough to be worth taking the time to read.

In my case, I wised up when I started paying attention to authors. When I started noticing a trend in the material I liked coming from the same group of authors. regardless of who they were publishing for.

And that revelation couldn't have happened if I hadn't started to notice the "revolving door," at the official company.

I no longer assume non-official = inferior... But I also can't think of any gentle way to open others eyes to that...

Taldor (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Modules Subscriber)

I experienced the same things, as though I had blinders on, I used to think that there was such a thing as offical content - but in the past 2 years, I've paid attention to the authors of the materials and actually realized that WOTC does not own dungeons and dragons any more than the NFL owns football. I started reading OGL materials, and realized the high quality of superior PAIZO materials and the brilliance of some NECROMANCER GAMES materials.

At that same time, the so-called designers of 4th editions were making fan-limiting choices about the fluff and crunch of the game - choices that were nonsensical or arbitrary, that's when I realized the "true" stewards of dungeons and dragons (as a beloved frpg steeped in tradition, history, and community) were the PAIZONIANS under the leadership of Erik Mona.

On these message boards I've asked people to reset their thinking, to look past the marketing of WOTC, and see that there is no such thing as "official content" anymore, because 4th edition breaks the continuity and 30+ years of game traditions. This is evident in their design choices, and reconcepting of our game.


DudeMonkey wrote:
DudeMonkey wrote:
At this point, there's no evidence to think that the license will strangle 3rd parties.
How wrong was I here?

Kudos. You're one of the few I've seen come out and admit that.


For a long time unofficial did equal inferior. Paizo really changed that with great material and high production quality.

WotC's move makes sense. They are just doing what works for them.

Oh, and BTW someone mentioned the software industry - believe me Microsoft does actively discourage folks from developing software for multiple versions of Windows.


DudeMonkey wrote:
DudeMonkey wrote:
At this point, there's no evidence to think that the license will strangle 3rd parties.
How wrong was I here?

You weren't wrong. At the time you were 100% correct.

Cheliax (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules Subscriber)

crosswiredmind wrote:

For a long time unofficial did equal inferior. Paizo really changed that with great material and high production quality.

WotC's move makes sense. They are just doing what works for them.

Oh, and BTW someone mentioned the software industry - believe me Microsoft does actively discourage folks from developing software for multiple versions of Windows.

Just one point though, offical doesnt mean quality either. Some of WotC's books leave alot to be desired....


carmachu wrote:
crosswiredmind wrote:

For a long time unofficial did equal inferior. Paizo really changed that with great material and high production quality.

WotC's move makes sense. They are just doing what works for them.

Oh, and BTW someone mentioned the software industry - believe me Microsoft does actively discourage folks from developing software for multiple versions of Windows.

Just one point though, offical doesnt mean quality either. Some of WotC's books leave alot to be desired....

I agree 100% - though that has alway been the case.


Pax Veritas wrote:


On these message boards I've asked people to reset their thinking, to look past the marketing of WOTC, and see that there is no such thing as "official content" anymore, because 4th edition breaks the continuity and 30+ years of game traditions. This is evident in their design choices, and reconcepting of our game.

So has every frickin edition before it.

Osirion (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path Subscriber)

Viktor_Von_Doom wrote:
Pax Veritas wrote:


On these message boards I've asked people to reset their thinking, to look past the marketing of WOTC, and see that there is no such thing as "official content" anymore, because 4th edition breaks the continuity and 30+ years of game traditions. This is evident in their design choices, and reconcepting of our game.
So has every frickin edition before it.

I Don't know that they did to the same extent as 4e.

I transitioned quite nicely from OD&D to Ad&D to 2e to 3e and the things I learned about the world in OD&D have for the most part stood me in good stead all the way to today.

There have been a few odd tweaks here and there but I always knew that gold dragons were inherently good, red dragons were always evil, and which creatures were demons and which were devils.


Wicht wrote:
Viktor_Von_Doom wrote:
Pax Veritas wrote:


On these message boards I've asked people to reset their thinking, to look past the marketing of WOTC, and see that there is no such thing as "official content" anymore, because 4th edition breaks the continuity and 30+ years of game traditions. This is evident in their design choices, and reconcepting of our game.
So has every frickin edition before it.

I Don't know that they did to the same extent as 4e.

I transitioned quite nicely from OD&D to Ad&D to 2e to 3e and the things I learned about the world in OD&D have for the most part stood me in good stead all the way to today.

There have been a few odd tweaks here and there but I always knew that gold dragons were inherently good, red dragons were always evil, and which creatures were demons and which were devils.

All so whats stopping you from using the previous fluff (I hate that word)? Its not like WotC is going to come to your house and put a gun to your head and force you to use it.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber)

Viktor_Von_Doom wrote:
Pax Veritas wrote:


On these message boards I've asked people to reset their thinking, to look past the marketing of WOTC, and see that there is no such thing as "official content" anymore, because 4th edition breaks the continuity and 30+ years of game traditions. This is evident in their design choices, and reconcepting of our game.
So has every frickin edition before it.

I would have to disagree here. At least how I interpreted it, "breaking continuity" refers to the fluff as well as some core basics of the game mechanics. Of course, there is debate about where to draw the line, but it's pretty clear that pretty much through 1, 2, and 3e, there was a Great Wheel cosmology, demon succubi, schools of magic, alignment for everyone, wizards memorizing/preparing all of their spells for the day, fireballs that were a handful of d6's for damage, so on and so on. There were of course changes between each edition , but the changes here seem far more significant (especially on the fluff side) than any previous edition change. 2 to 3 was pretty major, but much of the fluff and basics of how classes worked was tweaked not thrown out. Of course, many people do think all of those changes are for the better. But to deny that far more traditions are being changed with this edition shift than any past one is a pretty tall claim that I don't see much support for ("Every edition has had changes" and "Zee game remains zee same." aren't convincing arguments without more details). ;)

51 to 100 of 109 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Community / Gaming / D&D 4th Edition / All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure PathPathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Society, Pathfinder Battles, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.