Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop

Messageboards

Dispute with DM over a unfair trap, by Mike J

A new job opening at Paizo!, by hogarth

Sneak attack from Stealth RAW, by Cheapy

Planar Ally in PFS, by Bob Jonquet

Agile Maneuvers and Weapon Finesse as baseline?, by Sigard Spleenbiter

Ability Focus (Storm Mastery) or (1 Spell), by Hawkson

What do people think of the sword saint?, by LazarX

Fate of souls after death, by Drejk

Pathfinder programs, by Azure_Zero

Run as Written vs. GM Caveat...Are we being hypocritical?, by nosig

Small + Lance, Ideas?, by peterrco

Gang Up Feat Question, by setzer9999

80's and early 90's Disney cartoons, by Dragon78

Tiny Toon Adventures, by Legendarius

>>Ask Joss Whedon ALL your questions here<<, by Darth Knight

Online Campaigns

DM Corvus' Carrion Crown PBP, by Alzano Vignari

Hideouts & Hoodlums: Justice Society of America, by Scottenkainen

Sanosuke's Mormont's Gauntlet, by Silent, the boy

DaWay's Ruby Phoenix Tournament, by Nalita

DM Stephens Serpents Skull Campaign PBP Chapter 1: Smugglers Shiv, by Corbius Jank

The Story of the Stone: Kyrademon's Jade Regent PBP, Part III, by Kyrademon

Worldwound Adventures Discussion, by Malak Jaedoom

Hungry Voodoo's Safe Haven, by Bilbo Bang-Bang

Scipion del Ferro's Kingmaker Discussion, by Set

The Screaming Sky - DM Downrightamazed, by John Mcnaught

Hideouts & Hoodlums: Justice Society of America, by Scottenkainen

Star Wars - The Covenant of Shadows, by Desh

DM Iron-Dice PSF Adventures (Game), by DM Iron-Dice

Cap'n Voodoo's Freebooter PBP, by Cap'n Voodoo

Sean's Master of the Fallen Fortress, by GM Sean

   RSS Recent Posts Facebook Twitter Email
Note: Talk about 4th Edition here. Politely. Personal attacks or insults directed at other members of the Paizo community, or other companies in the industry, will not be tolerated.

Search
Search this Thread:

1 to 50 of 149 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
Osirion (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion Subscriber)

I've been reading a lot of the threads about 4.0, and am interested what people have experienced before drawing their conclusions. So I'd like to do a simple poll. Checked out some online ones, didn't see any good ones, so I thought I'd do an unofficial one here. We can count up the results as we go.

For the sake of reading these quickly, please attempt to leave out the 'whys' and whatnots. Just include the number, or the line, that best fits your experience. Also, assume that the higher choices can include the lower ones. So if you've read the core books and some previews, you can pick from 4-6. If you've played the preview, regardless of whether you've read the books or not, go with 1-3.

Thanks! To start things off, I'm #2.

1. Played the Keep of Shadowfell preview, I like it.
2. Played the Keep of Shadowfell preview, I'm not sure.
3. Played the Keep of Shadowfell preview, I dislike it.

4. Read the core books, I like it.
5. Read the core books, I'm not sure.
6. Read the core books, I dislike it.

7. Read the online previews, I like it.
8. Read the online previews, I'm not sure.
9. Read the online previews, I dislike it.

Osirion (Pathfinder Charter Superscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber)

#9 here; though we're playing the preview adventure in a couple of weeks so I'll let you know.

Cheliax (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber)

#6 here.

Cheliax (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules Subscriber)

#6 here as well

Osirion (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

#8 for me.

Shadow Lodge (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Battles Case Subscriber)

#6 for me. Though I have played a non-Shadowfell preview that also didn't help the opinion much.


#4.


#6 Sorry but classes feel like different magic decks that characters to play... There are some nice things they have introduced that would probably work very well in my new Prgp campaign I'm starting when I get the Beta. My current game should run its course by then.

Taldor (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules Subscriber)

#2, heading towards #3 as we continue playing

Osirion (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path Subscriber)

9 mostly


4

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

#9 and #6

I dislike the new 4.0 rules so much I BORROWED the books rather then buy them. This is from someone who enjoyed Complete Champion mind you... ::sighs:: WotC thou haft forsaken thine fan-base...


4

Still happy with 3.5, though, and the fun games I'm playing are all 3.5, so I'm in no hurry.


5 for me ^^U

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules Subscriber; GameMastery Superscriber)

#9

Qadira (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Modules Subscriber)

#8

Andoran (RPG Superstar 2008 Top 32, 2011 Top 16)

#9


#4

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting Subscriber)

#6


#6


#5

I am trying to stay open minded and i want to give a chance to D&D4, but i am not very enthusiastic, and i am actually at the border of #6.


#1


#4

Qadira (Paizo Charter Superscriber)

#6 here

Andoran (Pathfinder Charter Superscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber)

#5 going so very close to #6 its not funny.


#3 and #4!

Cheliax (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules Subscriber)

6.


#4. Read the core books, I like it.

Having a hard time getting my friends interested in even a playtest, but fact is I flatly refuse to actually stat anything up for 3.5 anymore, so in the end they'll have to.

We'll see which way it goes.


#6. Having read the books, I think the system's mechanically sound, but it just doesn't have the feel I'm wanting out of D&D. Not cancelling my pre-order, though, if for no other reason to support my FLGS.

Andoran (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, GameMastery Maps Subscriber)

6, Six is me.

-DM Jeff


#9, but only marginally - totally and completely uninterested.


#9 For me.All I needed to see was the previews.


#1 and #4. Hope to see Paizo 4E contributions soon.


#1 for me.

Osirion (Pathfinder Charter Superscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber)

#9

Taldor (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

1. Played the Keep of Shadowfell preview, I like it.

Andoran (Pathfinder Superscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber)

#5.

The rules looked interesting, but I knew I wouldn't have an informed opinion until I did some playtesting. So far, at least with 3rd level PCs, combat action feels homogeneous.


#1 & #4 - It's definitely not 3.5, and changes the gameplay quite a bit. Taking it as a new game system, I admit that I do like it. Not that I would forsake my precious PFRPG game, but I like the way both systems deal with some of the problems of 3.5. I really think 4E will be better once they come out with more material for it. This is just the core rulebook after all.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path, Companion, Tales Subscriber)

6


Hovering between #4 and #5. I like what I see, but waiting for a session of actual play before I make my final verdict.


Karui Kage wrote:


6. Read the core books, I dislike it.

The easiest way I can sum up how I feel about 4e is this: OMG! R U SRS? i hav 1337 pwrz?!? my wzrd can shot lazerz 4, like, evar?!?!1?11? Pew pew pew!"


#1

I liked it. Our group of players enjoyed it as well. I havent received the core books yet so cant give an opinion, and i care not for reviews so i just ignore them. Why? Because my review is the only review that counts, that's why.

From the Mind of Thoth-Amon


Carl Cramér wrote:

#4. Read the core books, I like it.

Having a hard time getting my friends interested in even a playtest, but fact is I flatly refuse to actually stat anything up for 3.5 anymore, so in the end they'll have to.

We'll see which way it goes.

Looks like for your players, it's time to find a new GM.

I'm a #9.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

4. Read the core books, I like it.


Where does "I played nine games, from demos to delves to unofficial eight hour+ games based on the collected ENworld rules" fall under?

Cheliax (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Tales Subscriber)

6.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber)

#9 (number nine, number nine, number nine, number nine, number nine, number nine, number nine, number nine, number nine, number nine, number nine, number nine, number nine, number nine, number nine... .... ....)

God bless the white album ;-)

Cheers,
Colin


Karui Kage wrote:


9. Read the online previews, I dislike it.

That's it.


#1 & #4

Andoran (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion, Tales, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber)

#6

1 to 50 of 149 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Community / Gaming / D&D 4th Edition / All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure PathPathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Society, Pathfinder Battles, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.