Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop

Messageboards

Need mount use advice for luring cavalier, by Egoish

Ganging up on your foes-aren't these guys supposed to be heroes?, by gnomersy

Untitled III, by Aberzombie

Save or Die Spells: Keep Them Out of PvP Please, by Daniel Powell 318

Deep 6 FaWtL, by Aberzombie

Any conversion of the 4e Genasi ?, by Drejk

Phalanx Soldier + Skirnir Magus, by galahad2112

Acrobatics moving through Large or larger opponents, by Weables

Are magical weapon costs too high in PFS?, by Alitan

Item Creation Problems, by rat_ bastard

Run as Written vs. GM Caveat...Are we being hypocritical?, by Alitan

Don't Reply To This Thread!, by Dave Tennant

Creating a Bard (that doesn't suck), by Mergy

Paizo Blog: Pathfinder Battles Preview: Familiar Faces, by Soulkeeper

Bestiary 4 Wish List, by Sincubus

Online Campaigns

New Beginnings!, by Gandal

DM Zyren's Heart of Madness, by Dm Zyren / Heart of Madness

Curse of the Crimson Throne / Edge of Anarchy (DM Amethyst), by Copper Fratello

Legacy of Fire: Upon Shifting Sand [Chapter 1: Howl of the Carrion King] Recruitment, by Mark Sweetman

DM Aron Marczylo's Kingmaker - Part 1: Stolen Land, by Jameson Addercop IV

Megan's Curse of the Crimson Throne [IC], by Varrel

Shackled City (Pathfinder) - GM_Chris, by GM_Chris

DM Voice's Envoy of Geb - Game Thread, by DM - Voice of the Voiceless

Wellards RotRL OOC thread, by Bill Lumberg

Steel Wolves - Mercenary Campaign Game Thread, by Sentis Spinis

DM Aron Marczylo's Curse of the Crimson Throne - Part 3, by Llyra Bjorgan

Hunger and Darkness - Reclaiming Tar-Urkatha, by Padrym Steelribs

Jade Regent, presented by DM Hamied - Campaign Thread, by Sorin Nicusor

Dm Zyren's Heart of Runes, by Ailetha Aurcalam

Shadowrun 4e Gangland Sports, by Abraham spalding

   RSS Recent Posts Facebook Twitter Email
Search
Search this Thread:

51 to 74 of 74 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

Gjoren the Hound wrote:


You said there was an issue with Track and I was just looking for clarification on that portion, not the medium armor shenanigans.

Sorry, I misunderstood. In the Pathfinder Beta, Track isn't a feat, it's a class feature. You can put it in your feat list if you want, I suppose.


Panda40 wrote:

Ok...here's my monk...

https://secure.paizo.com/people/Panda40

I apoligize if I got anything wrong....

Thanks!
Ed

Ed,

Your character is missing two feats; a level 2 human monk gets two feats at level 1, plus Improved Unarmed Strike, plus two monk bonus feats. I would suggest something that will help you hit in combat, perhaps Weapon Finesse.

You should also indicate how many skill ranks you have in each skill.

(Male Half-Dwarf Fighter 1/ Wizard 10/ Loremaster 2)

Thanks - made the fixes....

Ed


Ok, awesome. Sorry for the confusion! Ready to roll, then.

Andoran (Male Elder Human Mage and Cleric of Name Levels)

Updated my sheet and ready to roll. (Forgot to include my gauntlet on the sheet, since I am using lighter armor that did not include it naturally.)


O.K., the game thread is up and you can start posting now. Good luck to everyone! (Especialy me.)

http://paizo.com/paizo/messageboards/community/gaming/playByPost/hogarthsSh ackledCityGame


hogarth, as I mentioned in the game thread, I’m trying to update Myvannuii to the final rules, and I just want to make sure that I’m not getting it wrong. I’m thinking that a wild mage is closer to a universalist than a specialist, since there's no “wild magic” school, so I’ll drop the bonus spells as universalists no longer get them. Also, I wanted to wait until the game got out of combat before asking a question about how a wizard’s bonded item works with recharge magic. If Myvannuii uses her bonded object to cast a spell that she doesn’t have prepared, does it replace a spell of that level that she has prepared? I guess this wouldn’t be a problem in a game with standard spellcasting, where one would just burn a spell like any other, but where they recharge I’m wondering if it would be more balanced this way. That is, for example, if you can only have one x-level spell prepared, but it recharges, would ruling that using your bonded item to cast another spell replaces that spell as the one that you have prepared be more in line with how bonded items are supposed to work? That way the bonded item doesn’t become even better in a game with recharge magic, where you could otherwise go back to casting a spell that's more generally useful after the recharge time. Or am I misreading how bonded items work?


I'll say that the bonded item allows you to cast one spell of your choice per day without any recharge time. Otherwise I agree that it would be a bit useless. :-)


By the way, there's now a built-in dice roller on this site!

E.g.
1d20 + 5 ⇒ (8) + 5 = 13

2d6 + 4 ⇒ (6, 3) + 4 = 13


You guys wouldn't be accepting new players would you?


Not right at the moment. I'll let you know when the next player quits in disgust. :-)


Hogarth -I hope you're keeping an eye on this board as I didn't want to stop the flow of the campaign.

I am finding it a little tough to be more than a stereotypical NPC fighter - primarily because it isn't a character I rolled (and I picked up mid-adventure) and I can't generate a flavour for the wannabe brewer (no pun intended).

I would like to roll a new fighter when it is sensible - and I can then give him a character I can role-play fully.

In terms of rolling something up, the rules I have picked up are:

1. Pathfinder Core Rulebook (plus the web traits - not sure how many)
2. Hit points will be max at first level, max-2 for each additional level, with no racial hp
3. Start at Level 2 - not sure if anyone has advanced as yet
4. 25 point buy to start
5. Not sure what to do about equipment. I read 100gp and 1000gp (misprint I think)?
6. Don't think there is a number 6?

Can you check the above and point me in the right direction.

Thanks - abstract xp


Bron L wrote:

Hogarth -I hope you're keeping an eye on this board as I didn't want to stop the flow of the campaign.

I am finding it a little tough to be more than a stereotypical NPC fighter - primarily because it isn't a character I rolled (and I picked up mid-adventure) and I can't generate a flavour for the wannabe brewer (no pun intended).

I would like to roll a new fighter when it is sensible - and I can then give him a character I can role-play fully.

In terms of rolling something up, the rules I have picked up are:

1. Pathfinder Core Rulebook (plus the web traits - not sure how many)
2. Hit points will be max at first level, max-2 for each additional level, with no racial hp
3. Start at Level 2 - not sure if anyone has advanced as yet
4. 25 point buy to start
5. Not sure what to do about equipment. I read 100gp and 1000gp (misprint I think)?
6. Don't think there is a number 6?

Can you check the above and point me in the right direction.

Thanks - abstract xp

1. I don't think anyone has any traits. We're using the core book only, so far, but if you want something unusual, I'm willing to consider it.

2. Yup.

3. After this fight (assuming that you guys prevail), you'll have enough XP for level 3. So you'd be starting at level 3, most likely.

4. Yup.

5. That's not a misprint. It's either 1100 gp or (100 gp & a +1 weapon or armor). It'll be higher for a level 3 character, though. Let me think about it; it'll probably be something like (N gp & a magic weapon/armor & another magic item).

6. There probably is a #6, but I forgot. :-)

Don't worry -- I don't think this fight (plus possible denouement) will last forever...

EDIT: For my reference, a link to the original recruiting thread:
http://paizo.com/paizo/messageboards/community/gaming/connection/archives/r ecruitingForShackledCityPbPMostlyPFRPGBeta


I can't wait for the Templar class from Paizo next year. Just like a Paladin, but you don't have to be LG. Having said that, I may chose a Paladin instead of a Fighter? None of the party are evil.

Do you have an issue with a Paladin? It'll certainly give me something to role-play. I just picked up the Tome of Secrets and it has a good section on flaws and the like - so I will certainly add some of these.

The new classes it introduces are OK and the book itself is alright. Perhaps a little expensive here in the UK (£20/US$40) but I like to have choices.


abstract xp wrote:

I can't wait for the Templar class from Paizo next year. Just like a Paladin, but you don't have to be LG. Having said that, I may chose a Paladin instead of a Fighter? None of the party are evil.

Do you have an issue with a Paladin? It'll certainly give me something to role-play. I just picked up the Tome of Secrets and it has a good section on flaws and the like - so I will certainly add some of these.

The new classes it introduces are OK and the book itself is alright. Perhaps a little expensive here in the UK (£20/US$40) but I like to have choices.

Hogarth - in case you were wondering, the above post is mine...


I don't have a problem with a player playing a paladin. It's downright commendable. :-)


The beta Cavalier is out from Pathfinder. This is the 'Paladin' that doesn't have to be LG. Same principles but you follow either a deity or a cause, or a noble or...

Need to make sure it's not broken, but it really appeals when Bron is retired.


Yup, I've taken a look at it, and you're welcome to play one!


hogarth wrote:
Yup, I've taken a look at it, and you're welcome to play one!

As you hopefully can tell from my posts, I'm positioning Bron as having lost heart during the recent encounter at the smithy.

How soon will you need to approve my new character to replace Bron? Do you have a steer as to what you want to see? I'm still keen on a faith based Paladin (what alignment restrictions would you want to impose)?


Good question. I had expected the multi-alignment paladins to be part of the Advanced Player's Guide playtest, but it looks like they won't be.

Why don't we discuss what changes you'd like to make to the paladin class? I'd be open to something like the "Paladin of Freedom" from Unearthed Arcana, for instance (using the PFRPG paladin as a base).


hogarth wrote:

Good question. I had expected the multi-alignment paladins to be part of the Advanced Player's Guide playtest, but it looks like they won't be.

Why don't we discuss what changes you'd like to make to the paladin class? I'd be open to something like the "Paladin of Freedom" from Unearthed Arcana, for instance (using the PFRPG paladin as a base).

I could do a standard Paladin but with a different alignment/god. Or I could go with a Cavalier (faith based though). I'll have to see if I can borrow a copy of Unearthed Arcana.

Or a Barbarian with a twist. Kind of a David Banner. Relatively high INT that can add something to the party when not in a rage.

I like to have a dimension to my characters - and Bron seems too straight-laced as a fighter.

Or I could do a rogue/assassin type or even a ranger - but perhaps the party need another melee character? I'm very flexible but like to have characters with a twist.


abstract xp wrote:

I could do a standard Paladin but with a different alignment/god. Or I could go with a Cavalier (faith based though). I'll have to see if I can borrow a copy of Unearthed Arcana.

Or a Barbarian with a twist. Kind of a David Banner. Relatively high INT that can add something to the party when not in a rage.

I like to have a dimension to my characters - and Bron seems too straight-laced as a fighter.

Or I could do a rogue/assassin type or even a ranger - but perhaps the party need another melee character? I'm very flexible but like to have characters with a twist.

Any of those ideas would be fine by me. I think a paladin or cavalier would work especially well.


I have the basics of a Paladin. What's my spend? It'll help me decide what direction I ultimately take.


Bron L wrote:
I have the basics of a Paladin. What's my spend? It'll help me decide what direction I ultimately take.

It's a 25 point buy. For equipment, I'll look it up, but it should be something like any masterwork stuff you want, plus a +1 weapon (or equivalent) plus a +2 stat booster (or equivalent). I'm flexible, if you want something different.

51 to 74 of 74 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Community / Online Campaigns / Play-by-Post Discussion / All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

Recent threads in Play-by-Post Discussion

Wellards RotRL OOC thread
Cap'n Voodoo's Muster
Zyren's luxurious campfire... this time with marshmallows...
Call of the Wardens Discussion
Worldwound Adventures Discussion
Elven team in Campaign Elves vs Dwarves -- Dwarves and Gnomes Keep Out Discussion
Left in Sandpoint OOC
Academy of Secrets Discussion
Rev's Lost City (4e Paragon) - discussion thread
Megan's Carrion Crown OOC Thread
Of Battle, Wolves and Winter. Discussion
Ringtail's Rise of the Runelords OOC
The Academae Discussion Thread
Ashardaldon Series OOC
DM Stephens Serpents Skull Campaign - OOC Discussion
Kyrademon's Transnational PBP -- Discussion, Description, and Preparation
Wrath's RotRL
DM Rennick's Jade Regent: The Prophecy of the Seal Discussion
GM / Lictor Lane's Who Needs Parenting - CoT Team 1 OOC Thread
Voodoo's Caravanserai



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure PathPathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Society, Pathfinder Battles, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.