Pathfinder Battles Preview: Hoist the Black Flag: Skull & Shackles!

Friday, March 8, 2013

I am pleased to announce today that the next major Pathfinder Battles release will be a full 55-figure set inspired by Paizo’s popular Skull & Shackles Adventure Path! Skull & Shackles casts players in the role of a gang of pirates with their own ship, struggling to make a name for themselves in the treacherous southern seas of the Pathfinder Campaign Setting!

The new Skull & Shackles Pathfinder Battles prepainted fantasy miniatures set provides players and GMs with legions of figures to kit out their seafaring campaigns, from pirates to aquatic menaces to undead horrors from the briny deep!

Our partners at WizKids have been delivering amazing new sculpts and killer paint masters on a weekly basis, and things are moving very rapidly with this set as we head toward its summer 2013 release (more later on the specific date when WizKids locks down a few more details on the manufacturing side).

As with previous major Pathfinder Battles releases, the Skull & Shackles set features a special limited-edition figure available only to folks who purchase a case. This time around, it’s the Gargantuan Skeletal Dragon Brinebones, a major antagonist in the campaign that easily stands toe-to-bony-toe with our previous Gargantuan dragon releases (and other Gargantuan dragons yet to come). Check out these very early behind-the-scenes photos of the Gargantuan Skeletal Dragon from WizKids’s factory!

Of course, the set contains a fair share of Small, Medium, and Large figures as well. Let’s take a look at a few of these water-logged beasties for just a hint of what’s in store when the set releases this summer.

Here we have the squamous Sea Troll, a deadly denizen of the deeps eager to munch your player characters into chum. He stands with a bit of a curved spine, making him a little smaller than the Troll Champion from the Shattered Star set. But when you get this figure in hand, you’ll agree that he fits right in with his big land-dwelling brother. Only I think he may be a little bit cooler, which is saying something, since the Troll Champion is my favorite figure from the last set. When WizKids brought the Sea Troll to our office, everyone agreed that it was a step forward for the line. You guys are going to love it.

Of course, the set includes lots of pirates, with this guy here being just the first of several we’ll show off in the coming weeks. The sculpt detail on this fellow is amazing, and I suspect he will see lots of use by GMs as well as players looking for a cool swashbuckling figure.

There are, of course, lots more figures to show off in this set, but we’ve got a lot of weeks between now and the summer and plenty of time to show them all off.

In the coming months, look forward to more pirates, more aquatic creatures, more creatures never before produced in prepainted plastic, and more figures specifically demanded by you here on paizo.com.

And while you’re checking out the Skull & Shackles set, keep in mind that WizKids is hard at work on the NEXT set after that. With the set-to-set improvement we’ve seen on paint steps and sculpts we’ve seen so far, I can’t even imagine how amazing THAT one is going to be!

More next week, you scallywags!

Erik Mona
Publisher

More Paizo Blog.
Tags: Pathfinder Adventure Path Pathfinder Battles Skull & Shackles
1 to 50 of 123 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>

1 person marked this as a favorite.

The Skeletal Dragon is fantastic. And I'm really looking forward to more aquatic creatures.

Grand Lodge

I haven't read through the whole AP, but does this mean some figures with guns? And people of a certain nation that is involved?


Pathfinder Adventure Path, PF Special Edition Subscriber

Nice! These will probably work out well for Razor Coast as well!

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber

That Dragon looks fantastic as does the Sea Troll. I gotta say that with all the commotion from teh last set with folks getting broken minis I'm a tad worried about that dragon. Has there been any discussion regarding packaging?

Granted... this won't stop me from picking one up along with the rest of the set, I'm just wondering ;-)


Damn you Paizo, how can I possibly say no to a pirate mini set!

Paizo Employee Chief Technical Officer

Kieviel wrote:
Has there been any discussion regarding packaging?

Yes, lots! WizKids knows that that's the number one area where they need to improve, and are committed to doing so.

Grand Lodge

Damn you Paizo.

Well played Erik.

Sovereign Court

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I just need to know how much time I have to save up for the set.

Shadow Lodge

Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
Vic Wertz wrote:
Kieviel wrote:
Has there been any discussion regarding packaging?
Yes, lots! WizKids knows that that's the number one area where they need to improve, and are committed to doing so.

Glad to hear it Vic, thanks for the quick response too!


Vic Wertz wrote:
Kieviel wrote:
Has there been any discussion regarding packaging?
Yes, lots! WizKids knows that that's the number one area where they need to improve, and are committed to doing so.

Seems to me it would do a world of good to just flip the thin plastic holders around so that the openings in them face the box walls at least that way the larges couldn't crush the Mediums.

Liberty's Edge

Azmyth wrote:

Damn you Paizo.

Well played Erik.

I guess this speaks to the dev time issues; though I am surprised you went in support of an AP release BEFORE Shattered Star. Didn't see that one coming. I thought we might see a more generic branded set followed by Wrath of the Righteous.

Well, I'm a player in this one too. *grins and dodges bullet*


OMG!!! I am sooooo happy to see this set. Pirate pre-painted minis are greatly under-represented! Thank you for making this set! Now I am looking forward to the Friday reveals even more than I did before. Here's hoping Paizo does not give Erik any more vacations days until the set has been fully revealed.

Shadow Lodge

Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber

So now I'm wondering if one of the unrevealed goblin minis is a gryndilow ;-)

RPG Superstar 2011 Top 16

Grindylows!


Erik Mona wrote:
Of course, the set includes lots of pirates, with this guy here being just the first of several we’ll show off in the coming weeks.

Does this "pirate mini" have a name at this time?

Paizo Employee Publisher, Chief Creative Officer

8 people marked this as a favorite.

Yep. His name for the moment is "Pirate". It'll likely change, but that's the name for now. He is not, in any event, a specific character from the campaign. Those come later. :)

And because I know folks are wondering, the set does include about five figures armed with pistols or that have something to do with gunpowder. Jus enough to please folks who want it, but no enough to spoil the set for those who don't.

Shadow Lodge

Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
Erik Mona wrote:

Yep. His name for the moment is "Pirate". It'll likely change, but that's the name for now. He is not, in any event, a specific character from the campaign. Those come later. :)

And because I know folks are wondering, the set does include about five figures armed with pistols or that have something to do with gunpowder. Jus enough to please folks who want it, but no enough to spoil the set for those who don't.

I would like to suggest that the pirate gets named "Albert" as that seems like a name that would bring lots of childhood teasing and result in a life of piracy.


I think this is a great choice, and I'm thrilled to see it! I think the only AP I'd have liked to see supported more is Kingmaker, and that's mostly because I'm running a campaign in it now. But I've always thought that we needed more aquatic minis, and I expect to see a lot of them here. Dare I also hope for some cool dungeon dressing sorts of pieces? (Or maybe ship-dressing in this case?) For instance, a nice Large-sized rowboat would be cool. I'm rooting for a ballista too!


Vic Wertz wrote:


Kieviel wrote:

Has there been any discussion regarding packaging?

Yes, lots! WizKids knows that that's the number one area where they need to improve, and are committed to doing so.

I hope they are addressing more than just the packaging. My minis see a lot of use, and therefore they are at risk of breakage after the protective packaging is removed.

I decided not to buy any Shattered Star minis due to the fragility (sadly there's at least 20 "must haves" in that set). I would hate to have to pass on this one too.

I understand the argument that the rigid plastic makes for more detailed sculpts, and I'm not trying to force anyone to go back to the age of floppy-swords. I am simply casting my vote for durability.

Sorry to complain. I love the Pathfinder Minis line, and I want to be able to buy them again. This is intended as constructive feedback.

P.S. Love this preview!

Grand Lodge

Erik Mona wrote:
And because I know folks are wondering, the set does include about five figures armed with pistols or that have something to do with gunpowder. Jus enough to please folks who want it, but no enough to spoil the set for those who don't.

I was thinking this would be a good set for Lirianne to be one of the included iconics :)

Edit: While this is not one of the first back-APs I wanted to see, I'm still looking forward to it.

The Exchange

I didn't see this coming, but I am glad we are getting a set that is a pretty current adventure path than one that isn't unobtainable. Kudos to the new set.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Oh. Oh my.

I'll be in my bunk.

Scarab Sages

Argh!!
First the Skulls & Shackles pawns. And then Razor Coast in all its glory. And after that Razor Coast being an option for being available within the Realm Works Kickstarter. And Freeport for Pathfinder being Kickstarted. And buying an extra set of pawns because I wasn't sure if I'd already bought them and they look so damned good.
And now this...

Can I not get a clear sign whether I need to run a pirate campaign or not?


I would be interested to know if the rarities for NPCs in this set will be more akin to the Runelords set or the Shattered Star set. In my opinion, the Shattered Star set, where NPCs were all rares, was much better than Runelords, where you got 3x Tsuto, Ameiko, Orik, etc. When Shattered Star came out, I purchased singles as opposed to the case, thinking I would end up with a ton of duplicates that I didn't want/need had I bought the case. Turned out I would have been fine because the distribution changed. Can someone in the know weigh in on this? It will likely determine whether or not I buy a case this time around.

Paizo Employee Publisher, Chief Creative Officer

Generally speaking we'll try to keep NPCs at uncommon or rare. I'd prefer rare more often than not, especially in the case of oddball one-off NPCs, but this set in particular has a lot of named NPCs who could just as easily be "generic pirate" or something, so there is some bleed over into uncommon. I think you'll be pleased with how the rarities break down.


Has the format for future releases been nailed down yet? As in, can we expect most releases to be a set of 55 with boosters of 1 large + 3 others? Or are they still likely to switch around on a set by set basis?


Steve Geddes wrote:
Has the format for future releases been nailed down yet? As in, can we expect most releases to be a set of 55 with boosters of 1 large + 3 others? Or are they still likely to switch around on a set by set basis?

I get the impression this is the distribution that's working best for them. I personally love it, just hoping we can get the two plastic "shells" in the boxes to have openings facing out rather than towards each other, that should help a ton.


Erik Mona wrote:
Generally speaking we'll try to keep NPCs at uncommon or rare. I'd prefer rare more often than not, especially in the case of oddball one-off NPCs, but this set in particular has a lot of named NPCs who could just as easily be "generic pirate" or something, so there is some bleed over into uncommon. I think you'll be pleased with how the rarities break down.

Sounds good to me. Thanks!

RPG Superstar 2012 Top 4

As the RPG Superstar contestant labeled "obsessed with all things aquatic," I am giddy with anticipation to see more aquatic miniatures.

Dark Archive

These look amazing very interested...please are they still looking at tweaking the plastic mix though? Little too much breakage in the last set I hope this one survives better.

Shadow Lodge

Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder PF Special Edition Subscriber
Erik Mona wrote:
Generally speaking we'll try to keep NPCs at uncommon or rare. I'd prefer rare more often than not...this set in particular has a lot of named NPCs ...so there is some bleed over into uncommon. I think you'll be pleased with how the rarities break down.

I hope the NPC types don't overrun the monsters. Shackles did indeed have a lot of humanoids, but a number of incredible monsters. The balance between monster and humanoid was almost perfect in shattered star. Mind you the NPC art was pretty damn good in the AP.

Now these three - Troll (Scrag) remarkable. Things just keep getting better for the trolls. This is looking to be a great mini. Nice colour, great sculpt, lok at the detail in the skin! I can see it upsetting those who aren't fond of the pathfinder troll asthetic, but that's certainly not me! Looks to be slightly smaller (not by much) than the troll champion, so so does this set the size for trolls? Is the intention they should be taller and heavier than the giants?

Pirate - nice start to generic NPC's. Good easy to use pirate with a nice sculpt and colour. So good to see clear facial features - this has been a real step up over the sets.

The Dragon - not what I was expecting in this one. Makes sense in the context of the AP. It looks really well sculpted and I can't wait to see it in full colour. My big concern is fragility - this one looks fragile and given the harder plastic used to give those cleaner, better sculpts...

Just one question Erik - I vaguely remember you sayin this set would be more generic and less AP. The opening says "inspired" by shackles - how closely is this set married to that AP?

Paizo Employee CEO

Steve Geddes wrote:
Has the format for future releases been nailed down yet? As in, can we expect most releases to be a set of 55 with boosters of 1 large + 3 others? Or are they still likely to switch around on a set by set basis?

That is the format that we are using as our baseline and is the format that the Skull & Shackles set will use, and the one after that too. If we decide to change that format, we will let you know.

-Lisa


So Lisa, does that mean you won't be doing any Huge minis for this set? I would really like to see some more huges that are new, and this set has a number of great ones. A huge shark would be awesome. Actually, several sizes of sharks would be awesome.

Paizo Employee CEO

Cat-thulhu wrote:
Just one question Erik - I vaguely remember you sayin this set would be more generic and less AP. The opening says "inspired" by shackles - how closely is this set married to that AP?

I am not Erik, but I can answer this question. The "generic" set that you are thinking about is the one after this one. The Skull & Shackles set is firmly rooted in the AP.

-Lisa

Shadow Lodge

Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder PF Special Edition Subscriber

Ahh. Very good. Not that I care, minis are minis and the more the merrier. In fact having seen the art for the mighty fine fish folk in this AP I have huge hopes - some of my favourite beasties where in that path. Any chance of a goblin pirate - well any goblin with a gun really...

Paizo Employee Publisher, Chief Creative Officer

Very closely. We've got a non-AP-specific set coming up some time in the future, but this one isn't it. Every creature in this set is taken from the AP or its support products.


"Very closely. We've got a non-AP-specific set coming up some time in the future, but this one isn't it. Every creature in this set is taken from the AP or its support products."

Do you mean we might see something from the Isles of the Shackles Campaign Setting?

Dark Archive

How about a certain Grindylow of "large" proportions?


Looking very nice so far. I already have a couple of big undead dragons coming from Reaper, but might have to look at getting them another friend.

That troll is great though! The way he's holding those cleavers I really want to get him a chefs apron or something. For some reason he puts me in mind of an angry chef storming out of the kitchen...

Shadow Lodge

Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder PF Special Edition Subscriber
Erik Mona wrote:
Very closely. We've got a non-AP-specific set coming up some time in the future, but this one isn't it. Every creature in this set is taken from the AP or its support products.

So a good chance of Grindylows, sahuagin and weresharks? Wooooo, I hope so.

Paizo Employee Chief Technical Officer

1 person marked this as a favorite.
DonalGraeme wrote:
So Lisa, does that mean you won't be doing any Huge minis for this set? I would really like to see some more huges that are new, and this set has a number of great ones. A huge shark would be awesome. Actually, several sizes of sharks would be awesome.

We have other ideas about how to deal with Huge minis. You'll learn about one such idea very soon.


Lisa Stevens wrote:
Steve Geddes wrote:
Has the format for future releases been nailed down yet? As in, can we expect most releases to be a set of 55 with boosters of 1 large + 3 others? Or are they still likely to switch around on a set by set basis?

That is the format that we are using as our baseline and is the format that the Skull & Shackles set will use, and the one after that too. If we decide to change that format, we will let you know.

-Lisa

Cheers, Lisa. It's a pretty good compromise, I think. The H&M set had just a little too few sculpts and RotRL had such a huge price-tag.


Was personally hoping this set would be Kingmaker, a lot of the beasties from there would make neat minis. Really personally did not like Skull & Shackles at all, but the skeletal dragon looks nice. Might change my mind after I see more minis from this set, but this might be the first PF minis set that I pass on.

Paizo Employee Chief Technical Officer

Aarontendo wrote:
These look amazing very interested...please are they still looking at tweaking the plastic mix though? Little too much breakage in the last set I hope this one survives better.

We have asked them to solve the breakage problems primarily by modifying the packaging. The plastic they're using actually has a wide variety of densities, even within the same mold—they can make the tip of a sword softer than the shaft, for example—and they will be looking more carefully at things like the dragon to make sure the density in each part of the mini is appropriate. But we're generally very happy with the material they're using; it allows them to capture the quality that we're looking for, and that we think most of our customers are looking for. If the price of that quality is that you need to treat them a bit more carefully than other plastic minis, we're willing to accept that.


Vic Wertz wrote:
DonalGraeme wrote:
So Lisa, does that mean you won't be doing any Huge minis for this set? I would really like to see some more huges that are new, and this set has a number of great ones. A huge shark would be awesome. Actually, several sizes of sharks would be awesome.
We have other ideas about how to deal with Huge minis. You'll learn about one such idea very soon.

Let me guess... Huge White Dragon?

Paizo Employee Publisher, Chief Creative Officer

Alephtau wrote:
this might be the first PF minis set that I pass on.

I doubt it. ;)

Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Lisa Stevens wrote:
Steve Geddes wrote:
Has the format for future releases been nailed down yet? As in, can we expect most releases to be a set of 55 with boosters of 1 large + 3 others? Or are they still likely to switch around on a set by set basis?

That is the format that we are using as our baseline and is the format that the Skull & Shackles set will use, and the one after that too. If we decide to change that format, we will let you know.

-Lisa

Honestly, that's cool with me because it feels better to pay like $16 for four miniatures than $6 for one. But that's just my opinion.

Dark Archive

Ah cool Vic thanks for the update on that. It's true that the primary breakage was due to rampant on the loose ogres in the box! I had some issues with the spidery-type guy in the last set as well, but those legs are so delicate I could see why it happened. Glad to hear that they're looking at those issues. =)

Sovereign Court

I do like that pirate figure. Can always use those things. Paizo trolls I have mixed feelings about. The skeletal dragon is neat looking.

1 to 50 of 123 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Paizo / Licensed Products / Miniatures / Paizo Blog: Pathfinder Battles Preview: Hoist the Black Flag: Skull & Shackles! All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.