In penance for yesterday's blog post being all mean about not giving out new art and punishing folks and all that, I present to you four more monsters from the upcoming Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Bestiary 2! What do these monsters all have in common? They're all based on monsters that come from mythology or the public domain—see if you can recognize any of them! Look for Bestiary 2 in bookstores, hobby stores, and on paizo.com in November.
The wyvern variant could be a skoffin. That has the right number of wings and legs and is in the public domain.
There's the great white whale, who I expect is statted up as the "dire cachalot" or somesuch.
There appears to be a dire manatee too. However, judging from the bite scar on it, it's probably a particularly tubby sea wolf.
And of course, there's a wendigo, who unfortunately has no feet. Otherwise he could wear wendigo go-go boots. Though those would be a good cursed item--boots so wickedly stylish that they burn your feet off and turn the rest of you into a wendigo.
I would like to take this moment to apolagise to Mark and everyone else about my comments and accusations in yesterdays blog. they were false and groundless and for that I am sorry.
I would like to take this moment to apolagise to Mark and everyone else about my comments in yesterdays blog. My comment were groundless and for that I am sorry.
It's all good, Kevin. Emotions run high sometimes, and the internet isn't the ideal place to deal with them when they do. Let's leave yesterday's blog behind us and revel in the glory of these awesome monster pics today!
The wyvern variant could be a skoffin. That has the right number of wings and legs and is in the public domain.
Had to fine-tune my Googles to find skoffin hits within range of the pic(I got some sort of cat urban legend and metal albums on the first page...), but it looks like it pans out!
You guys apparently don't know beans about what Garys look like. Their bodies are perfect spheres of flame, off of which run long eyestalks that end in naked eyeballs and also several tentacles.
G.A.V. using underhand tactics ? Like that's something new. Remember those Pseudonatural Half-neothelid Giant Moles he sent against Pett 3 weeks ago ? Just right after the mole hunting season was over in the UK ?
Yeah, that Charybdis would sure be different from classical descriptions. Looks more like a dire fiendish manatee. Or wait...maybe it's the Seal of N’gah. ^^
"If his chest had been a cannon, he would have shot his heart upon it!"
Ever since I saw the first picture, I need to keep myself from making "your mom" jokes.
Tommaso Matteucci wrote:
sad to see the wendigo isn't getting the ultra-awesome art from PF6...
Yeah. Sometimes, the decisions about what pictures to get new and what pictures to recycle confuse me (look at stuff like nymphs or succubi in bestiary 1)
Picture 2 reminds me of Ithaqua, the Wind Walker of the Cthulhu mythos (who had a connection to the wendigo). Picture 3 could be a Shantak (described as huge, scaly, birdlike creature with batlike wings, slimy skin, and two strong talons).
To be honest, I have a love/hate relationship with art of Kev Crossley (PF 6 wendigo artist). One time it's beautiful, another time it's a mess full of little maggots.
But I heard that Kev improved on this front lately.
sad to see the wendigo isn't getting the ultra-awesome art from PF6...
While Kev Crossley's image of the wendigo from PF #6 was indeed awesome, his art style on that particular piece just doesn't fit with the rest of the book, so we re-did the art. That hardly means we're not using Kev anymore, though! He did all the chapter break illos for "Book of the Damned II: Lords of Chaos" and they look really cool; we previewed some of them on this blog a few weeks back, in fact.
Yeah. Sometimes, the decisions about what pictures to get new and what pictures to recycle confuse me (look at stuff like nymphs or succubi in bestiary 1)
The choice as to whether or not to recycle art is a complex one—but it basically boils down to "Is this picture appropriate enough in the opinion of us at Paizo to re-use, or should we pay to get a new version done that more closely matches the overall art style of the monster book?" Our hardcover bestiaries are far and away the most art intense books we produce, and if we had to pay for new art for every picture, we'd end up having to charge a lot more for the book, which would suck. Usually the amount of art we want to re-order vastly outnumbers what we can afford, so we have to make a certain amount of Sophie's choices and compromises now and then. It's actually one of the harder parts of putting a Bestairy together—some of the choices cause a fair amount of agonizing in house before we finally settle on what direction to go.
Yeah. Sometimes, the decisions about what pictures to get new and what pictures to recycle confuse me (look at stuff like nymphs or succubi in bestiary 1)
The choice as to whether or not to recycle art is a complex one—but it basically boils down to "Is this picture appropriate enough in the opinion of us at Paizo to re-use, or should we pay to get a new version done that more closely matches the overall art style of the monster book?" Our hardcover bestiaries are far and away the most art intense books we produce, and if we had to pay for new art for every picture, we'd end up having to charge a lot more for the book, which would suck. Usually the amount of art we want to re-order vastly outnumbers what we can afford, so we have to make a certain amount of Sophie's choices and compromises now and then. It's actually one of the harder parts of putting a Bestairy together—some of the choices cause a fair amount of agonizing in house before we finally settle on what direction to go.
I don't care, I just wants some pitchers of wimmen that are often nekkid! ;-P
(My gripe with the succubus is purely taste - I just think her face is too ugly to be a succubus. The nymph, though, is too blue for a regular Nymph. Personally, I blame all the rabid Avatar fanbois and their drooling over blue chicks!)