Elves and sleep


Rules Questions

1 to 50 of 61 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

14 people marked this as FAQ candidate. Answered in the errata. 1 person marked this as a favorite.

Okay, so I've heard that in earlier editions of D&D, elves didn't sleep at all. But in Pathfinder, there's nothing in the race description in the Core Rules (unless I'm just blind) saying that they don't sleep. They're immune to magical sleep effects, but there's nothing saying they don't sleep naturally every night.

But then I just happened to stumble across the spell nightmare, which says (near the end of the text) that "Creatures who don't sleep (such as elves, but not half-elves)..."

Okay, what? Did they just forget to delete that? Or did they forget to include text in the Races chapter stating that they don't sleep?

Or am I just not seeing something?


They sleep. No where in the post-beta materials will you find that Elves don't sleep.

Also:

http://paizo.com/paizo/messageboards/paizoPublishing/pathfinder/pathfinderR PG/general/elvesAndSleepienessWhyAreElvesImmuneToMagicalSleep&page=1&am p;source=search#5


Pathfinder Maps, Starfinder Maps Subscriber

I'd assume they sleep. That could be a big problem otherwise, especially since a lot of Elven PCs in Pathfinder turn out to be Wizards, who prepare their spells after 8 hours of sleep.

Maybe elves choose to sleep when they take the path of the wizard.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

So then there needs to be eratta in the nightmare text, yes?


Elves in Pathfinder sleep, they are just do it when they want not when someone magically forces them to. Nightmare spell is probably just a case of "copied from 3.5 without correcting" error. Or maybe Elves are intended to be immune to nightmare but not because they do not sleep but their immunity to magical sleep effects.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Drejk wrote:
Or maybe Elves are intended to be immune to nightmare but not because they do not sleep but their immunity to magical sleep effects.

Couldn't be that, because it doesn't say "elves are immune to this spell", it says that creatures who don't sleep are immune to it, and then lists elves as an example of creatures who don't sleep.

I guess we should collect FAQ clicks to get nightmare corrected, eh?

FAQ the OP, please!


Yes, the Nightmare spell needs an errata. I see no reason why elves would be immune to it in Pathfinder.

Grand Lodge

The elves not sleeping thing is a Forgotten Realms thing.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Its talked about it Elves of Golarion. Not sure if its official or not but...

Elves of Golarion:
Sleep:
Though elves are immune to magical sleep effects, the idea that they never rest is a myth. Instead, though they do not fall unconscious the way other humanoids do, elves may enter a deep trance that has the same refreshing effect on the mind as human sleep. An elf only needs to meditate in this fashion for 4 hours per day, though some prefer longer periods. During this rest, an elf performs habitual mental exercises, reviews old memories, allows his intuition to seek enlightenment, and so on. Some mischievous elves enjoy perpetuating the myth that their kind is always awake and elven towns have no beds; the truth is that while some elves prefer to meditate in a chair or on a couch, others enjoy the comfort of an actual bed.


Ishmell wrote:
Its talked about it Elves of Golarion. Not sure if its official or not but...** spoiler omitted **

Elves of Golarion is a 3.5 edition book. It wasn't written for Pathfinder.

Elves did trance in 3.5 because it specifically said they did in the racial description in the Player's Handbook.

JAmes Jacobs had this to say on EN World about the matter:

Quote:

Elves not sleeping is indeed relatively setting specific, and while trances are in Elves of Golarion, it's something we'll honestly probably be moving away from in Golarion. We've done a fair amount to reimagine our elves, and by having them sleep (or at least implying they sleep) does help to make Golarion's elves more Golarion and less Forgotten Realms (which is the actual only setting in which elves don't sleep, I believe... even though they seem to still be on a day-night cycle and often have beds in their homes...).

BUT! If you prefer the non-sleeping elves, that certainly still works in your game. Unless I'm wrong, there's nothing in the elf flavor text in the PRPG that says they DO sleep, is there?


It does specifically say that Elves are immune to magical sleep. In 3.5 they meditated, but they simplified it to just normal sleep in pathfinder.

Liberty's Edge

blackbloodtroll wrote:
The elves not sleeping thing is a Forgotten Realms thing.

James Jacobs has said that on a couple of occasions, by way of explaining that Elven trance/sleep was removed because it was only FR setting info, but it is erroneous.

The idea of Elves resting via a trance rather than sleep first appears (to my knowledge) in The Lord of the Rings, and has been in the game for years. I believe it is also the basis for their resistance to magical sleep and ghouls' paralyzing touch.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
CBDunkerson wrote:

The idea of Elves resting via a trance rather than sleep first appears (to my knowledge) in The Lord of the Rings, and has been in the game for years. I believe it is also the basis for their resistance to magical sleep and ghouls' paralyzing touch.

Its not the basis for those abilities. Elves not needing sleep was introduced in 2nd edition D&D (Complete book of Elves) as a possible explanation of why elves were immune to sleep.

Elves have immunity to sleep and ghoul paralysis as balancing mechanisms that date back to the Chainmail miniatures game that D&D grew from. Making elves not need to sleep was a way to explain why elves were immune to sleep magics.

Liberty's Edge

Jeraa wrote:
Its not the basis for those abilities. Elves not needing sleep was introduced in 2nd edition D&D (Complete book of Elves).

Hmmm, I thought I remembered it from before that (though that's still 20 years ago), but I'm not seeing it in my dusty D&D Basic Rules or AD&D PHB. Of course, I read Tolkien before either of those came out so maybe that's why I remember it from way back.

In any case, it was in non-setting source books for v2, v3, v3.5, and v4... thus not a 'Forgotten Realms only' kind of thing.

Grand Lodge

In the end, Pathfinder elves sleep.


Half-elves are immune to magical sleep as well, so why they are specifically called out as not being immune is odd, considering all the core races sleep in Pathfinder.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

As I understand it the Core Rules don't ever specifically say anyone has to sleep for any other reason than to get back spells. It provides no mechanical penalty for not sleeping. Interestingly it does provide a penalty for sleeping in armor (which might lead an optimizer of a strictly martial character to never sleep). D20pfsrd.com has collected some old rules and common house rules, but if you look through the entire core book you'll only find rules about what happens if you sleep in armor, or the necessity of sleeping to get back spells.

Collected rest rules


After a little bit of searching, elves trancing may have been introduced into D&D by the Forgotten Realms setting. The first Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting was published in 1987, while the Complete Book of Elves wasn't published until 1992.

Its possible that the Complete Book of Elves took it from the Forgotten Realms, and applied it to elves as a while. Later editions just took it from there, and it continued. (The Complete Book of Elves detailed elves from several settings, like Greyhawk, the Realms, Dark Sun, etc.)


It is an artifact of earlier editions (although I liked it)

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I am unsure why, but elves in general leave a bad taste in my mouth. Kender, and anything related to them though, make me cry blood in the madness of rage.


blackbloodtroll wrote:
I am unsure why, but elves in general leave a bad taste in my mouth. Kender, and anything related to them though, make me cry blood in the madness of rage.

Kender are awesome, but that's another thread.

I think it was something meant to point out different elves were from humans. Since elves were like fey, and fey don't sleep. then elves don't either. I'm not a fan of it as it just seems too easy an way to make them different. Can't we come up with more interesting flavor text for elves? Maybe elves are immune to sleep spells just because of their resistance to magical enchantments and familiarity with such magic (like Puck's fairy dust from a Midsummer's Night Dream).

I do think the Nightmare spell is a copy pasta mistake.

Silver Crusade

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
darth_borehd wrote:
blackbloodtroll wrote:
I am unsure why, but elves in general leave a bad taste in my mouth. Kender, and anything related to them though, make me cry blood in the madness of rage.

Kender are awesome, but that's another thread.

I think it was something meant to point out different elves were from humans. Since elves were like fey, and fey don't sleep. then elves don't either. I'm not a fan of it as it just seems too easy an way to make them different. Can't we come up with more interesting flavor text for elves? Maybe elves are immune to sleep spells just because of their resistance to magical enchantments and familiarity with such magic (like Puck's fairy dust from a Midsummer's Night Dream).

I do think the Nightmare spell is a copy pasta mistake.

As far as Golarion is concerned, elves are

Spoiler:
aliens from the planet Castrovel

and that's likely the reason behind their sleep resistance.


Are elves immune to poisons that cause sleep, like that of the pseudodragon?


No. They are only immune to magical sleep effects. As an Extraordinary ability (Ex), the pseudodragons poison is nonmagical, and the elf is not immune to it. Spell-like (Sp) and Supernatural (Su) abilities are magical, however.

Special Ability Types


http://www.d20pfsrd.com/basics-ability-scores/glossary

under rest, it shows the benefits and penalties. There are many more rules than "armored or unarmored." It also notes the following:

"For most creatures resting means sleeping. In some worlds some races can gain the benefits of rest simply by sitting quietly maintaining an awareness of their surroundings, while in other worlds those races must sleep, which leaves them vulnerable to attack."

Therefor I believe it not only depends on the module, but the DM. Which in the end, will always be the final say.

just my 2 cents, hope it helps.


Arise, thread! Thread, arise!

Elves, by default, sleep. They may not have to sleep on some worlds, but RAW they could still be induced to sleep by non-magical means. No rule in the section on sleeping states that elves do not sleep, nor does the elf write-up. Ruling that they don't sleep is fine, exactly as much as ruling that dwarves have no sweat glands.

For that matter, not all elves are immune to magical sleep effects. The dreamspeaker alternate racial trait replaces elven immunities and would make little sense if elves never slept--dreamspeakers would never use their ability to send messages to other elves, only non-elves or elves with alternate racial traits replacing elven immunities


But how long do elves sleep? Assume that spells are not in play. Must all races sleep the same length of time?

Grand Lodge

Frank Daniels wrote:
But how long do elves sleep? Assume that spells are not in play. Must all races sleep the same length of time?

Same. Unless noted otherwise.


I've run elves as having the ability to trance, but it being mildly uncomfortable. Not debilitating, but not something the average elf would do unless circumstances demand it. The only kind of elves who make regular use of trance in my games are active soldiers and monastic orders, the former for tactical advantage, the latter for self-control and meditation.


This was all covered in length, back when the second darkness AP came out and the original CRB debuted.

during the SD AP, the PCs encounter elves in their native setting, and….they DO not have beds.
They have trance mats.
They don't sleep.

BUT that changed when pathfinder went LIVE.
So basically, that was retconned.

At the time, the argument for it was that by having an elf in the party, no one needed to arrange a nighttime rest guard schedule as the elf could cover it… then here was the discussion about elves not regaining spells because they didn't sleep and etc etc.

so In Golarion, elves sleep


Gorbacz wrote:
darth_borehd wrote:
blackbloodtroll wrote:
I am unsure why, but elves in general leave a bad taste in my mouth. Kender, and anything related to them though, make me cry blood in the madness of rage.

Kender are awesome, but that's another thread.

I think it was something meant to point out different elves were from humans. Since elves were like fey, and fey don't sleep. then elves don't either. I'm not a fan of it as it just seems too easy an way to make them different. Can't we come up with more interesting flavor text for elves? Maybe elves are immune to sleep spells just because of their resistance to magical enchantments and familiarity with such magic (like Puck's fairy dust from a Midsummer's Night Dream).

I do think the Nightmare spell is a copy pasta mistake.

As far as Golarion is concerned, elves are

** spoiler omitted **
and that's likely the reason behind their sleep resistance.

Except that origin isn't certain, only that they exist in both places and used to travel back and forth when the elf gates were fully functional, prior to earth fall.


MendedWall12 wrote:
As I understand it the Core Rules don't ever specifically say anyone has to sleep for any other reason than to get back spells. It provides no mechanical penalty for not sleeping.

Note: this may have been true in 2012, but the FAQ now says that if you miss a night of sleep you are fatigued.


Jeraa wrote:
Ishmell wrote:
Its talked about it Elves of Golarion. Not sure if its official or not but...** spoiler omitted **

Elves of Golarion is a 3.5 edition book. It wasn't written for Pathfinder.

Elves did trance in 3.5 because it specifically said they did in the racial description in the Player's Handbook.

I believe that you are wrong.

Golarion is the Pathfinder campaign setting world, isn't it?... I don't recall Wizards of the Coast creating a world called "Golarion"...

And,... As far as I am aware, there was no "Pathfinder 3.5 edition"... 3.5 edition was "D&D" made by Wizards of the Coast, not Pathfinder, which was made by Paizo, right?...

Paizo wrote "Elves of Golarion", not Wizards of the Coast... and they call it "Elves of Golarion", not "Elves of Faerun"...

So how can anyone get that "Elves of Golarion" is a 3.5 edition book?

Even if Paizo wants to get away from 3.5 edition "non-sleeping elves", they still wrote the book, which includes the chapter that Ishmell quoted, saying that elves trance for 4 hours to rest.

I call that official. It's in an official Piazo book regarding elves.

So my vote is that elves in the Pathfinder setting officially trance for 4 hours to rest, as it is written. - Of course, Rule 0 always applies, and if a DM wants the elves in his world to have to sleep, then by all means, they need to sleep.


I believe Paizo made products for D&D under the Open Gaming License until 4th edition came out. Then they created the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game because 4th edition didn't have the OGL. That's why it's considered backwards compatible.

Grand Lodge

Well, this was oddly necro'd.


Quote:

I believe that you are wrong.

Golarion is the Pathfinder campaign setting world, isn't it?... I don't recall Wizards of the Coast creating a world called "Golarion"...

And,... As far as I am aware, there was no "Pathfinder 3.5 edition"... 3.5 edition was "D&D" made by Wizards of the Coast, not Pathfinder, which was made by Paizo, right?...

Paizo wrote "Elves of Golarion", not Wizards of the Coast... and they call it "Elves of Golarion", not "Elves of Faerun"...

So how can anyone get that "Elves of Golarion" is a 3.5 edition book?

Even if Paizo wants to get away from 3.5 edition "non-sleeping elves", they still wrote the book, which includes the chapter that Ishmell quoted, saying that elves trance for 4 hours to rest.

I call that official. It's in an official Piazo book regarding elves.

So my vote is that elves in the Pathfinder setting officially trance for 4 hours to rest, as it is written. - Of course, Rule 0 always applies, and if a DM wants the elves in his world to have to sleep, then by all means, they need to sleep.

Golarion pre-dates the Pathfinder RPG (by about 2 years, I think). It was originally written as a setting based on 3.5 D&D rules. You can check the publishing dates on Elves of Golarion and the first printing of the Pathfinder Core Rules to see that. Or look in Elves of Golarion, and you will find references to skills that do not exist in Pathfinder (the stats for elves in the book include bonuses to Spot and Listen, which do not exist in Pathfinder as they were combined into Perception).

It is a 3.5 edition book because it was written using the 3.5 edition rules. It doesn't matter who made it.

If you are going to tell someone they are wrong, at least make sure you are right first.


Elves don't sleep.

They wait.

Grand Lodge

Elves are aliens, that travel through stargates, and some sleep so go good, they trip balls, and travel through dreams.

If they are too black, they're evil. If they are too white, they are racist pricks.


Chaylafaysky, you are wrong.

Golarion was written for 3.5 rules prior to 2009 and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game rules beginning in 2009.

There were no Pathfinder Roleplaying Game publications prior to 2009. The Paizo transition from 3.5 publications to Pathfinder Roleplaying Game publications occurred during 2009.

Elves of Golarion was published in 2008. It is written for 3.5, not the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game.

Check the dates.


Jeraa wrote:
Quote:

I believe that you are wrong.

Golarion is the Pathfinder campaign setting world, isn't it?... I don't recall Wizards of the Coast creating a world called "Golarion"...

And,... As far as I am aware, there was no "Pathfinder 3.5 edition"... 3.5 edition was "D&D" made by Wizards of the Coast, not Pathfinder, which was made by Paizo, right?...

Paizo wrote "Elves of Golarion", not Wizards of the Coast... and they call it "Elves of Golarion", not "Elves of Faerun"...

So how can anyone get that "Elves of Golarion" is a 3.5 edition book?

Even if Paizo wants to get away from 3.5 edition "non-sleeping elves", they still wrote the book, which includes the chapter that Ishmell quoted, saying that elves trance for 4 hours to rest.

I call that official. It's in an official Piazo book regarding elves.

So my vote is that elves in the Pathfinder setting officially trance for 4 hours to rest, as it is written. - Of course, Rule 0 always applies, and if a DM wants the elves in his world to have to sleep, then by all means, they need to sleep.

Golarion pre-dates the Pathfinder RPG (by about 2 years, I think). It was originally written as a setting based on 3.5 D&D rules. You can check the publishing dates on Elves of Golarion and the first printing of the Pathfinder Core Rules to see that. Or look in Elves of Golarion, and you will find references to skills that do not exist in Pathfinder (the stats for elves in the book include bonuses to Spot and Listen, which do not exist in Pathfinder as they were combined into Perception).

It is a 3.5 edition book because it was written using the 3.5 edition rules. It doesn't matter who made it.

If you are going to tell someone they are wrong, at least make sure you are right first.

I did a little more research, and I still believe that you are wrong.

I also admit that I was wrong about something too, but first - It seems to me that are saying that the "Elves of Golarion" book was written for 3.5 D&D, not for "Pathfinder"... I can disprove that easily - the name of the book, printed right on its cover is: "Pathfinder Companion: Elves of Golarion"

The very title of the book, says that it is a Pathfinder book.

According to the Paizo wiki: "Paizo was publishing Dungeons and Dragon magazine under contract with Wizards of the Coast, who held the rights to D&D. Wizards of the Coast chose not to renew the contract in early 2007, and Paizo began publishing the Pathfinder periodical line as a replacement."

This clearly means that in "early 2007", Paizo stopped working for WotC, and began printing "Pathfinder" materials, and that the first products that Paizo were releasing used updated 3.5 rules under the OGL - This means that Pathfinder used "updated 3.5 D&D rules" at first (and it was jokingly named D&D 3.75) until the CoreBook was published in 2009.

The first materials published as "Pathfinder" are not branded as "3.5 D&D", they are branded as "Pathfinder" because Paizo was no longer under license from WotC - and "Elves of Golarion" is a Pathfinder rulebook. So you saying "it's 3.5" is either you saying "it's 3.5 D&D" which is blatantly wrong, or you saying "It's 3.5 Pathfinder"... which is admitting that it is Pathfinder... Right?

You could make the argument that since Elves of Golarion came out before the Pathfinder Corebook, that it's a "first edition" rulebook, and that the Pathfinder Corebook is in-fact a "second edition" rulebook, since it came out with the newly modified rules that changed the previous Pathfinder rules.

Either way, you were either wrong, or you were saying that it is Pathfinder, which I do not believe you meant.

Getting back to me, I was wrong (as I admitted) about there not being a "3.5 edition Pathfinder", as all Pathfinder materials between 2007 and 2009 were based on the 3.5 edition D&D OGL rules - I didn't know that.

Grand Lodge

In PFS, your Elf PC requires 8 hours of rest.


Gauss wrote:

Chaylafaysky, you are wrong.

Golarion was written for 3.5 rules prior to 2009 and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game rules beginning in 2009.

There were no Pathfinder Roleplaying Game publications prior to 2009. The Paizo transition from 3.5 publications to Pathfinder Roleplaying Game publications occurred during 2009.

Elves of Golarion was published in 2008. It is written for 3.5, not the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game.

Check the dates.

Nope, you are wrong - you can't go just by dates, you have to look at the brand names, and who owned what licenses with the dates.

"Golarion was written for 3.5 rules prior to 2009 and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game rules beginning in 2009." Between 2007 and 2009, Pathfinder used updated 3.5 edition rules, it says so in their wiki.

"There were no Pathfinder Roleplaying Game publications prior to 2009." Wrong - their wiki says that they released "Pathfinder periodicals" between 2007 and 2009.

"Elves of Golarion was published in 2008. It is written for 3.5, not the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game." Wrong - The book is not called "Elves of Golarion" - it is named "Pathfinder Companion: Elves of Golarion" <--- notice the trademark "Pathfinder" right in the name of the book?... Hum?...

Grand Lodge

Unless, of course, someone can prove otherwise.


Chaylafaysky,

You are confusing Pathfinder (Companion) with the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game.
They are not the same thing.

Try reading the inside cover of pre-2009 books (such as the Elves of Golarion) and then compare it to the later books.
They start with being compatible with 3.5 and then moves to being compatible with Pathfinder Roleplaying Game or 3.5.

Prior to 2009 there were no Pathfinder Roleplaying Game publications.
The Pathfinder Roleplaying Game did not happen until WoTC announced that they were shutting down 3.5 in favor of 4e and then announced that the OGL would not make the move.

Elves not sleeping is part of the 3.5 books, not the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game rules.


blackbloodtroll wrote:
Unless, of course, someone can prove otherwise.

You might be right... I do not play PFS - but if it is based off of the corebook, and does not take into account any previously printed rules, then maybe they went with 8 hour sleeping elves - I recall that James (a big-wig at Paizo specifically made some comment about wanting to "get away" from D&D elves, so maybe that's why it's not mentioned in the corebook, and so many people assume the "sleeping" elves)?

Even in 2nd edition AD&D there were core rules, and optional rules... Elves of Golarion is a "Companion" book, and could certainly be considered "optional", rather than "standard" - so there is a case for what you say.

Since I don't play PFS, I'll just take your word for it :)

Grand Lodge

Joshua J. Frost says they sleep.


Gauss wrote:

Chaylafaysky,

You are confusing Pathfinder (Companion) with the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game.
They are not the same thing.

Try reading the inside cover of pre-2009 books (such as the Elves of Golarion) and then compare it to the later books.
They start with being compatible with 3.5 and then moves to being compatible with Pathfinder Roleplaying Game or 3.5.

Prior to 2009 there were no Pathfinder Roleplaying Game publications.
The Pathfinder Roleplaying Game did not happen until WoTC announced that they were shutting down 3.5 in favor of 4e and then announced that the OGL would not make the move.

Elves not sleeping is part of the 3.5 books, not the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game rules.

Really?... "Pathfinder" and "Pathfinder Roleplaying Game" are two completely different games! is your defense?

Fine, have it your way. They are two different gaming systems, I'm not even going to try to argue the semantics of that - But, even by that definiton, "Elves of Golarion" is still a "Pathfinder" product, not "a 3.5 product" - it specifically states that "This product is compliant with the Open Game License (OGL) and is suitable for use with the 3.5 edition of the world’s most popular fantasy roleplaying game." - this note means that it is compatible with the 3.5 edition D&D rules - not that it IS a 3.5 D&D product.


Paizo lists it as 3.5.
So there's that.


For completion's sake, James Jacobs' response.


Chaylafaysky wrote:
blackbloodtroll wrote:
Unless, of course, someone can prove otherwise.

You might be right... I do not play PFS - but if it is based off of the corebook, and does not take into account any previously printed rules, then maybe they went with 8 hour sleeping elves - I recall that James (a big-wig at Paizo specifically made some comment about wanting to "get away" from D&D elves, so maybe that's why it's not mentioned in the corebook, and so many people assume the "sleeping" elves)?

Even in 2nd edition AD&D there were core rules, and optional rules... Elves of Golarion is a "Companion" book, and could certainly be considered "optional", rather than "standard" - so there is a case for what you say.

Since I don't play PFS, I'll just take your word for it :)

Take a look at what forum we are in.

Here, I will ctrl-C ctrl-P.

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / Rules Questions

Note that we are in the Pathfinder Role Playing Game forum. As opposed to the forums for the Pathfinder Campaign Setting or the Pathfinder Adventure Card Game or The Pathfinder Player Companions. All of these are Pathfinder products. Some of them are written for the Pathfinder RPG, which is what we talk about here in the Pathfinder RPG forum. Some are not. Elves of Golarion is not written to be compatible with the Pathfinder RPG. It is written to be compatible with Dungeons and Dragons edition 3.5. Hence what Elves of Golarion says is irrelevant to the Pathfinder RPG unless a Pathfinder RPG compatible material says otherwise.

1 to 50 of 61 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Elves and sleep All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.