A Temp. Agent |
Greetings, fellow adventurers. Please forgive my rather blatant intrusion upon your discussion forum.
I was browsing my way through the online campaign forums while searching for new games to potentially join, when I came upon the intriguing title shown as "The Long Campaign".
After a brief review, I see now that your campaign is still within the early stages and saw that you had recently lost one of your players due to life occurrences. As I find my roster fairly open at the moment, I humbly offer to throw my hat into the ring for joining your game.
Thank you for your consideration.
Avery
GM Emmjay |
If you have a level 1 character with exactly 2 xp I'll put it up to a vote with the group. The reason why I am so specific is that if you have more (or less) and you don't level up exactly with the remainder of the group we can't run the scenarios in the order already planned out.
GM Emmjay |
Yes, you are missing something here. We are playing official PFS characters, and running it as an official PFS scenario, or rather chain of them. It take 3xp to level up, and after this scenario they will have 2xp. Well, if you come in with a level 2, or a stock level 1 you won't level up at the same rate as the group. And, because scenarios have level requirements, if you don't level up with the group (and are the same level as the group) we can't do the scenarios in the correct order.
tl;dr = if you don't already have a character made that has completed 2 1xp scenarios already, no you cannot join in.
Duncan Blackfeather |
Speaking solely for myself, I'd prefer to run with 6 or fewer in any event. More than that creates crowded, cumbersome combat situations. Doesn't sound like its going to work out anyway.
A Temp. Agent |
Ah, I see. I have stumbled upon a type of game that I am only vaguely aware of. I have never been in any game of an official Pathfinder Society capacity before. Perhaps I will have to look into registering for future games.
Also, Duncan makes a fair point about 6 players being the top end of optimal capacity. Thank you for your time and enjoy your game.
GM Emmjay |
As I am sure that everyone here is aware, Paizo has decided to not support Pathfinder in its current form, instead later this year release and promote its new form, 2E.
As a player (and GM) who has spent tons of time, energy, and effort in playing, promoting by GMing, and paying this game, I think that that is a complete slap in the face. Especially since they have stated that when 2e comes out that they will stop supporting and producing content for 1e. That is a slap in the face to me, the paying player.
As such, I am done being a GM. I am not going to support a company by using their products and leading groups of players if they are going to abandon us. I am sorry that it has come to this, but quite frankly I'm pissed off with them right now.
Sorry to everyone concerned.
Ebert Shimmerblade |
I understand your feelings and concerns with the state of Paizo. Will you continue this table until the end of this scenario for us?
Juis Helfro |
I understand as well. I've got a lot of money and time in Pathfinder as well.
Duncan Blackfeather |
He's already gone. Marked the thread as inactive, so probably not coming back.
Sounds like there might be another GM willing to take us on in the works, at least through the end of this scenario. After that, I could run more of Season 4 if you like.
We'll see what happens to this game -- stay tuned to your PM's.
Duncan Blackfeather |
I understand the frustration. I really do but it isn't our fault. The least he could have done is given chronicles.
It was a thoughtless move. No question.
GM Dennis |
Hi everyone! I'm happy to guide you through the rest of this scenario, if you'll have me. I think the easiest way to continue will be to create a new thread, rather than waiting for this one to get reactivated and transferred over. I'll get that set up and post here (and PM) when it's ready to go.
Juis Helfro |
Thanks GM Dennis. Much appreciated.
GM Dennis |
Here's the new campaign thread. Head over there and I'll get us going on the rest of the scenario.