Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
General Discussion Recruitment Play-by-Post Play-by-Post Discussion
PaizoCon 2015

Pathfinder Roleplaying Game
Pathfinder Society

Pathfinder Beginner Box

Pathfinder Adventure Card Game

Pathfinder Comics

Pathfinder Legends

DM Bloodgargler's Kingmaker

Game Master BinkyBo

{Kingdom Tracking Sheet} {Downtime} {NPC list} {District Grid}


1,201 to 1,212 of 1,212 << first < prev | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | next > last >>

Downtime Gnome Sorceror (draconic) 4

I thought we would accompany our militia to impound the renegade farm to 'investigate' problems with the kobolds, but we can explore too.

When Green made his emancipation proclamation we probably forced the old slaver's hand.


Downtime Gnome Sorceror (draconic) 4

Happy Easter. I guess we are breaking for a while.

I would push the action like Painlord's guide says, but that hasn't worked out.

Assume Furiel is organizing the raid on the farm to impound the slaver's lands and try to find him to 'check his legitimacy' to hold his lands.


Meh.. Good guide. All points are what one should likely strive for.
But I get bored when I DM right.

The most efficient way forward would be...

1) Decisive group actions toward exploring, taking out villains etc... things that lead to encounters.

2) Then, take a week off in gameplay time for downtime. Though the character to character to NPC interaction is enjoyable to me, day to day content is bogging us down.

3) repeat until end of the month.

Oh yes! Happy Easter! I'm out looking for black market foreign chocolate. Love my country... hate our chocolate.


Downtime Gnome Sorceror (draconic) 4

Well, we will see how the slaver thing turns out.

I remember flipping a coin after waiting a week to break an impasse, and we know how that went :-) Now it goes as it goes!


Female Tiefling Witch (Winter Witch) 4 (HP 31/31 | AC:16 | T:12 | FF:14 | CMB: +2 | CMD:14 | Fort:+3 | Ref:+3 | Will:+4/+6 vs Illus | Init:+2 | Perc: +6 (See in Darkness) | Speed 30)

I thought the PCs were going to take care of Kinsilvi personally. That was what was expecting our next IC move to be, anyway.


Male Half Orc Oracle 2/ Barbarian (Invulnerable Rager) 2 HP 30/48 | AC:17 | T:13 | FF:16 | CMB: +5 | CMD:16 | Fort:+8| Ref:+2 | Will:+3| Init:+1 | Perc: +5 (Darkvision 60ft) | Speed 30

Yes, me too, after all, Green has been pretty clear about his desire to take the evil old man down himself.
Eh, chalk that one up to miscommunication then, no big deal right?


Female Tiefling Witch (Winter Witch) 4 (HP 31/31 | AC:16 | T:12 | FF:14 | CMB: +2 | CMD:14 | Fort:+3 | Ref:+3 | Will:+4/+6 vs Illus | Init:+2 | Perc: +6 (See in Darkness) | Speed 30)
Furiel wrote:
Furiel wrote:

Since Green is making a speech, Furiel decides to make one too.

"You need to know that there are some threats to our settlement already. Kesten, your Castellan and Guard Captain, will be looking into this threat today. Forces that liked how things were like before we arrived, are trying to keep us from making a unified land out here."

We can explore or go with Kesten to the farm to make sure there is no resistance. I would prefer the second.

Third post on raiding the farm.

So we all agree the PCs should go to Kinsilvi's, it looks like. I'm not sure announcing it to everybody who was listening was the best choice, but at least it looks like we're agreed on next steps.


Downtime Gnome Sorceror (draconic) 4

I did not announce a target. Only spoke in generalities. Green has made his hatred of slavery a public topic, Furiel has not.


Dwarf Transmuter 4 | AC 12 (14 w/MageArmor)/10/12 | HP 33/33 | F+4,R+2,W+5 | Init.+0 | Percept.+0 | SenseMotive +0

That course of action is fine by me.


Go in the morning? Go in at night?
Officious, roaring assault, or sneaky Petes?


Male Half Orc Oracle 2/ Barbarian (Invulnerable Rager) 2 HP 30/48 | AC:17 | T:13 | FF:16 | CMB: +5 | CMD:16 | Fort:+8| Ref:+2 | Will:+3| Init:+1 | Perc: +5 (Darkvision 60ft) | Speed 30

Well, I would suggest we do it in the open, officious and in broad daylight.
It would set a precedence in how we deal with internal threats, and might make it harder for rabble rousers to use it against us later on.

However, if people were more interested in trying to make it a more crushing victory by taking him apart bit by bit all stealthy like or something like that, I'm all ears.


Female Tiefling Witch (Winter Witch) 4 (HP 31/31 | AC:16 | T:12 | FF:14 | CMB: +2 | CMD:14 | Fort:+3 | Ref:+3 | Will:+4/+6 vs Illus | Init:+2 | Perc: +6 (See in Darkness) | Speed 30)

Loud works for me. If he runs we declare his land forfeit due to his abandonment of his duties to the kingdom or foreclose due to the completely unexpected infestation of kobolds.

1,201 to 1,212 of 1,212 << first < prev | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | next > last >>
Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Community / Online Campaigns / Play-by-Post Discussion / DM Bloodgargler's Kingmaker OOC All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

©2002–2015 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.